DOJ-OGR-00019605.jpg
424 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
424 KB
Summary
This document, dated September 28, 2020, is a legal argument asserting that a writ of mandamus is necessary to address inconsistent decisions by judges in the Southern District of New York concerning Ms. Maxwell's motion to consolidate. It concludes by recommending that the Court deny the government's motion to dismiss the appeal, emphasizing that deposition material will become moot once unsealed.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Her motion to consolidate is mentioned, and judges' decisions are said to be to her prejudice.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | judicial body |
Refers to the judicial body making decisions and considering motions.
|
| Southern District of New York | judicial district |
Where judges have reached inconsistent decisions.
|
| government | government agency |
Party whose motion to dismiss the appeal is being discussed.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unsealing order pending appeal
Ms. Maxwell’s motion to consolidate
Government’s motion to dismiss the appeal
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Part of the 'Southern District of New York'.
|
Relationships (2)
The judges in the Southern District of New York have reached inconsistent decisions to prejudice of Ms. Maxwell.
The government has a motion to dismiss the appeal before this Court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document