DOJ-OGR-00010127.jpg
767 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
6
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
767 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 6, 2012, presents an opinion on the ethical obligations of Brune & Richard lawyers concerning disclosures related to a new trial motion involving juror Conrad. It concludes that the lawyers did not violate their ethical obligations in their research, motions, or communications with the Court. The opinion is based on a review of various legal documents and transcripts, and references the New York Rules of Professional Conduct.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Conrad | Juror |
Juror whose conduct is the basis for a motion for a new trial
|
| Catherine Conrad |
Author of a letter to the Government; subject of a jury questionnaire and voir dire responses
|
|
| Susan Brune |
Author of letters; affiant in an affidavit with exhibits
|
|
| Parse | Defendant |
Party who filed a Waiver Brief
|
| Government attorneys | Attorneys |
Conducted adverse direct examination at a hearing
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune & Richard | Law firm |
Lawyers whose ethical obligations regarding disclosure and conduct are being analyzed
|
| Court | Legal body |
Recipient of disclosures; participant in a telephone conference call; where local rules are incorporated
|
| Government | Government agency |
Recipient of Catherine Conrad's letter; party in a waiver brief; conducted examination at a hearing
|
| Southern District of New York | Court |
Court whose local rules incorporate the New York Rules of Professional Conduct
|
Timeline (5 events)
2012-02-15/2012-02-16
Hearing with sworn testimony and adverse direct examination by Government attorneys
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Source of the Rules of Professional Conduct relevant to the case
|
Relationships (6)
Brune & Richard lawyers' ethical obligations regarding a new trial motion based on Juror Conrad's conduct
Brune & Richard lawyers' ethical obligations regarding disclosure to the Court and participation in a conference call with the Court
Catherine Conrad sent a letter to the Government
Susan Brune's affidavit includes Catherine Conrad's jury questionnaire and voir dire responses
Susan Brune sent letters and filed an affidavit in a case involving the Government
Key Quotes (1)
"A lawyer shall not knowingly: (1) make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal or fail to correct a false statement of material fact or law previously"Source
— New York Rule 3.3(a) and (b)
(Quoted as a relevant legal standard for lawyer obligations)
DOJ-OGR-00010127.jpg
Quote #1
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document