DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg

953 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
5
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document (court transcript/deposition)
File Size: 953 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from February 15, 2012, detailing the questioning of a witness, likely Ms. Conrad, in the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. The questioning focuses on her understanding of a court order and subpoena issued by Judge Pauley, her legal training, and her prior statements to court staff that she would not appear or testify. The witness also mentions having met Ms. Sternheim six times and having 'Googled' the questioner after a previous trial.

People (8)

Name Role Context
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS Defendant
Named in the case 'UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL.'
Judge Pauley United States District Judge
Issued a subpoena, served a subpoena, conferred immunity, had a clerk who was told by the witness she would not be co...
Mr. Okula Attorney
Makes objections during the questioning.
Ms. Conrad Witness/Deponent
The person being questioned, referred to as 'Ms. Conrad' by the questioner, states she is a trained lawyer, was serve...
Mr. Gair Attorney
Asks to be heard by the Court.
Ms. Sternheim
The witness met with her six times.
Deputy Clerk Court official
Was told by the witness that she would not be testifying today/coming to court.
Counsel Attorney
Represents the witness.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Government agency
Plaintiff in the legal case.
University of Chicago Educational institution
Mentioned in the context of legal training, with the witness stating, 'I'm not University of Chicago trained --'.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS Company
Court reporting service responsible for the transcript.

Timeline (4 events)

2011-12-20
A subpoena was served on the witness by Judge Pauley.
2012-02-15
The witness, Ms. Conrad, is testifying under court order.
Courtroom
The witness met with Ms. Sternheim six times before the current date.
A past trial occurred, after which the witness 'Googled' the questioner.
Ms. Conrad Questioner

Locations (2)

Location Context
Mentioned in relation to University of Chicago training.
The location where the witness was ordered to appear and where the testimony is taking place.

Relationships (5)

Ms. Conrad Professional/Legal Judge Pauley
Judge Pauley issued a subpoena to Ms. Conrad, and Ms. Conrad was under court order to appear before him. Ms. Conrad also told Judge Pauley's clerk she would not come to court.
Ms. Conrad Professional Ms. Sternheim
Ms. Conrad met with Ms. Sternheim six times.
Ms. Conrad Professional/Legal Deputy Clerk
Ms. Conrad told the deputy clerk she would not be testifying today/coming to court.
Mr. Okula Professional/Legal The Court
Mr. Okula makes objections to the Court.
Mr. Gair Professional/Legal The Court
Mr. Gair asks to be heard by the Court.

Key Quotes (3)

"I'm not University of Chicago trained --"
Source
— Ms. Conrad (In response to a question about being University of Chicago trained.)
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
Quote #1
"I Googled you after the trial."
Source
— Ms. Conrad (In response to a question about how she knew the questioner was University of Chicago trained.)
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
Quote #2
"I will not be coming today"
Source
— Ms. Conrad (Statement made by Ms. Conrad to the deputy clerk, which is being questioned.)
DOJ-OGR-00009919.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document