DOJ-OGR-00004897.jpg
1.46 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1.46 MB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a sealed case, filed on July 2, 2021. In the transcript, the judge questions a government representative, Mr. Rossmiller, about a procedural issue: why the government has filed a motion for relief from a protective order on behalf of a third party, rather than the third party's own law firm, Boies Schiller, filing it. The judge expresses skepticism about this arrangement and asserts their judicial authority, referencing the Martindell case as applicable precedent.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROSSMILLER | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the government, responding to questions from the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The speaker questioning Mr. Rossmiller about a procedural matter involving a third party.
|
| Martindell |
Mentioned by the court, likely in reference to a legal case or precedent.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | law firm |
Identified as the law firm for a third party that the court believes should have filed its own motion for relief from...
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the party that has moved for relief on behalf of a third party.
|
| Second Circuit | government agency |
Mentioned by the court at the end of the page, likely referring to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second ...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| DOJ-OGR | government agency |
Appears in the footer as part of a document identifier (DOJ-OGR-00004897), likely indicating the Department of Justice.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-07-02
A procedural discussion during a court hearing where the judge questions the government's motion for relief from a protective order on behalf of a third party.
Court of the Southern District (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the footer (SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.), likely referring to the United States District Court for...
|
Relationships (2)
The document is a transcript of a formal court proceeding where a judge (THE COURT) is questioning an attorney (MR. ROSSMILLER).
Mr. Rossmiller, representing the government, is acting on behalf of a client of the law firm Boies Schiller, but states he cannot speak to why Boies Schiller did not file the motion themselves.
Key Quotes (2)
"Why doesn't Boies Schiller make an application for permission to be relieved from the protective order?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge questioning why the third party's own capable law firm did not file the motion that the government is now bringing on their behalf.)
DOJ-OGR-00004897.jpg
Quote #1
"Because I understand that you don't think that Martindell is applicable here, but I do, and now I'm the judge."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge asserting their authority and interpretation of a legal precedent (Martindell) in disagreement with the position taken by Mr. Rossmiller's side.)
DOJ-OGR-00004897.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document