DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
1.11 MB
Extraction Summary
9
People
6
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (legal memorandum/letter motion)
File Size:
1.11 MB
Summary
This document is Page 3 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated October 7, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The text outlines legal precedents determining the scope of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes (Rule 16 and Brady), arguing that the prosecution is not obligated to produce records from other government agencies (like the SEC or components of the DOJ/FBI) unless a specific 'joint investigation' occurred. It cites various cases (Middendorf, Collins, Stein) to establish the criteria for what constitutes a joint investigation.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the document (Honorable Alison J. Nathan).
|
| Barcelo | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Barcelo regarding the definition of prosecution team.
|
| Stewart | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Stewart regarding the definition of prosecution team.
|
| Middendorf | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Middendorf regarding joint investigations.
|
| Collins | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Collins regarding joint investigations.
|
| Finnerty | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Finnerty regarding joint investigations.
|
| Stein | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited in United States v. Stein regarding the scope of the prosecution team.
|
| Locascio | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited regarding imputing knowledge of FBI agents to AUSAs.
|
| Ghailani | Defendant (Cited Case) |
Cited regarding speedy trial motions and DOJ involvement.
|
Organizations (6)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Public Company Accounting Oversight Board |
Mentioned in case citation regarding joint investigations.
|
|
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
Mentioned in case citations regarding joint investigations.
|
|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office |
Mentioned in case citation regarding coordination with SEC.
|
|
| New York Stock Exchange |
Mentioned in case citation regarding independent investigations.
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Mentioned in Ghailani citation; also appears in footer stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
|
| Federal Bureau of Investigation |
Mentioned in Locascio citation regarding agents uninvolved in the investigation.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction for the cited cases and likely the current case.
|
|
|
Appellate court for cited cases.
|
Relationships (1)
Prosecution Team
→
Legal Definition
→
Other Government Agencies
The document defines the relationship required (joint investigation) for discovery obligations to apply between the prosecution and other agencies (SEC, PCAOB, etc.).
Key Quotes (4)
"persons who are a part of the ‘prosecution team’ . . . who perform investigative duties or make strategic decisions about the prosecution of the case"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
Quote #1
"a prosecutor’s duty extends to reviewing such evidence only where the Government conducts a “joint investigation” with that agency or branch of government."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
Quote #2
"the involvement of agents from one component of an agency in an investigation does not render the entirety of that agency part of the prosecution team."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
Quote #3
"refusing to impute to AUSAs knowledge of reports prepared by FBI agents who were 'uninvolved in the investigation or trial of the defendants'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00001789.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document