HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017895.jpg
Extraction Summary
Document Information
This document is page 830 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It outlines legal standards for intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and negligence in the context of lawsuits related to the September 11, 2001 attacks (specifically the Ashton and Burnett plaintiffs). It significantly addresses banking liability, citing case law to establish that banks generally do not owe a duty to non-customers to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers, nor are they liable for injuries caused by money passing through routine banking services. While the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page; however, the legal precedents regarding banking liability are relevant to investigations into financial institutions that serviced high-risk clients.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ashton | Plaintiff |
Part of a group of plaintiffs alleging defendants aided the September 11 terrorists.
|
| Burnett | Plaintiff |
Part of a group of plaintiffs; referenced in case citations Burnett I.
|
| Baker | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in Baker v. Dorfman regarding negligent infliction of emotional distress.
|
| Dorfman | Defendant (Case citation) |
Cited in Baker v. Dorfman.
|
| Bovsun | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in Bovsun v. Sanperi regarding bystander theory.
|
| Sanperi | Defendant (Case citation) |
Cited in Bovsun v. Sanperi.
|
| Mortise | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in Mortise v. United States regarding direct duty theory.
|
| King | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in King v. Crossland Savings Bank regarding negligence claims.
|
| Palsgraf | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co. regarding duty of care.
|
| Renner | Plaintiff (Case citation) |
Cited in Renner v. Chase Manhattan Bank regarding bank liability.
|
Organizations (9)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Plaintiffs |
Group bringing a claim for trespass regarding World Trade Center property.
|
|
| N.Y. State Nat’l Org. for Women |
Cited in case law regarding trespass.
|
|
| Wantanabe Realty Corp. |
Cited in case law.
|
|
| City of New York |
Defendant in cited case Wantanabe Realty Corp.
|
|
| Crossland Savings Bank |
Defendant in cited case King v. Crossland Savings Bank.
|
|
| Long Island R.R. Co. |
Defendant in cited case Palsgraf.
|
|
| Al Haramain Islamic Foundation |
Defendant mentioned; negligence claims against them were dismissed.
|
|
| Chase Manhattan Bank |
Defendant in cited case Renner v. Chase Manhattan Bank.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017895'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Property intentionally entered by hijackers; subject of trespass claim.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for the laws and cases discussed.
|
Relationships (1)
Key Quotes (3)
"The attacks on September 11, 2001 were undoubtedly extreme and outrageous."Source
"Banks do not owe non-customers a duty to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers."Source
"Plaintiffs offer no support, and we have found none, for the proposition that a bank is liable for injuries done with money that passes through its hands in the form of deposits, withdrawals, check clearing services, or any other routine banking service."Source
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document