Ashton
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001-09-11 | N/A | Terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 | World Trade Center, New York | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017931.jpg
This document is page 28 of a Westlaw legal report regarding 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539). It discusses a legal motion for reconsideration filed by NCB (National Commercial Bank) regarding personal jurisdiction and subject matter jurisdiction under the FSIA. The text analyzes legal standards for reconsideration and jurisdiction, citing various precedents (Steel Co., Bush, etc.), but does not explicitly mention Jeffrey Epstein or Ghislaine Maxwell on this specific page, despite the House Oversight stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017926.jpg
This document is page 23 of a legal opinion from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (392 F.Supp.2d 539), printed from Westlaw with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It discusses the dismissal of certain claims (TVPA, negligence) against defendants including the IIRO, SAAR Network, and Tarik Hamdi, while analyzing RICO liability standards. A specific section details allegations against Tarik Hamdi, accusing him of supplying a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden in 1996, which was subsequently used to coordinate the African embassy bombings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017895.jpg
This document is page 830 from 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series. It outlines legal standards for intentional infliction of emotional distress, trespass, and negligence in the context of lawsuits related to the September 11, 2001 attacks (specifically the Ashton and Burnett plaintiffs). It significantly addresses banking liability, citing case law to establish that banks generally do not owe a duty to non-customers to protect them from the intentional torts of their customers, nor are they liable for injuries caused by money passing through routine banking services. While the document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page; however, the legal precedents regarding banking liability are relevant to investigations into financial institutions that serviced high-risk clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017845.jpg
This document is a page from a Federal Supplement (legal opinion) regarding civil litigation stemming from the September 11 attacks. It discusses motions to dismiss filed by Saudi defendants, specifically Prince Sultan and Prince Turki, as well as the National Commercial Bank, in cases alleging they provided material support to al Qaeda. The text details procedural history involving the transfer of cases between the District of Columbia and the Southern District of New York, and mentions a $4.5 billion claim by insurance companies.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity