HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
3 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
6
Organizations
5
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court opinion page / legal document
File Size:
3 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a 2005 court opinion regarding the September 11 terrorist attacks litigation. It discusses the dismissal of claims against the Saudi High Commission (SHC) and Prince Salman and Prince Naif based on the discretionary function exception to sovereign immunity, ruling that their funding decisions were policy-based and thus immune from suit.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Prince Salman | ||
| Prince Naif | ||
| King Fahd | ||
| Yasser Arafat | ||
| French Minister of Interior |
Organizations (6)
Timeline (3 events)
Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001
Bosnian war
Meeting with French Minister of Interior
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
→
→
to
Key Quotes (4)
"Accordingly, the Court finds SHC is immune from suit in this litigation."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
Quote #1
"Prince Salman’s direction of SHC, however, is discretionary."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
Quote #2
"conspiracy requires an agreement to commit a tortious act"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
Quote #3
"decisions grounded in social, economic, and political policy through the medium of an action in tort"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017919.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document