DOJ-OGR-00009038.jpg

684 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 684 KB
Summary

This legal document, part of a court filing from February 24, 2022, defines and analyzes the concept of "implied bias" as a basis for challenging potential jurors. It cites numerous legal precedents to explain that implied bias is presumed by law, regardless of a juror's stated impartiality, especially when a juror's personal experiences are similar to the issues being litigated. The document provides examples from past cases, such as jurors who were victims of crimes similar to those in the case they were hearing.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Torres
Party in the cited case Torres, 128 F.3d.
Sampson
Party in the cited case Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d.
Wood
Party in the cited case Wood, 299 U.S.
Haynes
Party in the cited case Haynes, 398 F.2d.
Daugerdas
Party in the cited case Daugerdas, 867 F. Supp. 2d.
Skaggs
Party in the cited case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co.
Hunley
Party in the cited case Hunley v. Godinez.
Godinez
Party in the cited case Hunley v. Godinez.
Burton
Party in the cited case Burton v. Johnson.
Johnson
Party in the cited case Burton v. Johnson.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Otis Elevator Co. company
Party in the cited case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co.
10th Cir. government agency
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, cited in Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co. and Burton v. Johnson.
7th Cir. government agency
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, cited in Hunley v. Godinez.
DOJ government agency
Appears in the footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00009038', likely referring to the Department of Justice.

Timeline (4 events)

1991
The case of Burton v. Johnson, a murder case.
10th Cir.
1992
The case of Hunley v. Godinez, where bias was implied for two jurors who were victims of burglaries similar to the one in the murder case they were deliberating.
7th Cir.
1998
The case of Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., where bias was implied based on a juror's experiences.
10th Cir.
The document discusses the legal concept of 'implied bias' as a basis for challenging a juror for cause during voir dire (jury selection).

Relationships (3)

Skaggs legal Otis Elevator Co.
Parties in the legal case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co.
Hunley legal Godinez
Parties in the legal case Hunley v. Godinez.
Burton legal Johnson
Parties in the legal case Burton v. Johnson.

Key Quotes (3)

"Implied or presumed bias is ‘bias conclusively presumed as a matter of law.’"
Source
— Torres, 128 F.3d at 45 (quoting Wood, 299 U.S. at 133) (Defining the legal concept of implied bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009038.jpg
Quote #1
"And in determining whether a prospective juror is impliedly biased, ‘his statements upon voir dire [about his ability to be impartial] are totally irrelevant."
Source
— Id. (quoting Haynes, 398 F.2d at 984) (Explaining that a juror's own assessment of their impartiality is not considered when determining implied bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009038.jpg
Quote #2
"[c]ourts imply bias ‘when there are similarities between the personal experiences of the juror and the issues being litigated.’"
Source
— Daugerdas, 867 F. Supp. 2d at 472 (quoting Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d at 163-64) (Describing one of the two ways in which courts imply bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009038.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document