HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
1.71 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal brief / court filing (motion for summary judgment)
File Size:
1.71 MB
Summary
This page from a legal filing argues that Edwards is entitled to summary judgment against Jeffrey Epstein. The argument relies on adverse inferences drawn from Epstein's invocation of the Fifth Amendment and his documented history of harassing and intimidating witnesses (who are also referred to as victims and potential accomplices). The document cites Florida case law to support the admissibility of witness tampering evidence as proof of consciousness of guilt.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant |
Party invoking the Fifth Amendment; accused of witness intimidation, harassment, and tampering to hide consciousness ...
|
| Edwards | Defendant/Counter-Claimant |
Party seeking summary judgment against Epstein.
|
| E.W. | Victim/Claimant |
Individual with a claim against Epstein that has 'substantial actual value'.
|
| Jost | Plaintiff in cited case |
Referenced in case law citation Jost v. Ahmad.
|
| Ahmad | Defendant in cited case |
Referenced in case law citation Jost v. Ahmad.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Florida 2nd District Court of Appeal |
Court that issued the opinion in Jost v. Ahmad (1998).
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document (indicated by Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT).
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown
Unknown
Epstein harassed, intimidated, and attempted to control witnesses.
Unknown
Jeffrey Epstein
Witnesses/Victims
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on the citation of Florida case law (Fla. 2nd Dist. Ct. App.).
|
Relationships (3)
Discussion of summary judgment and claims against Edwards.
Reference to E.W.'s claim against Epstein having substantial value.
Text describes Epstein's harassment, intimidation, and tampering with witnesses.
Key Quotes (4)
"No reasonable finder of fact could rule in Epstein’s favor on his claims against Edwards."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
Quote #1
"Epstein’s guilt is also reasonably inferred from his harassment of, intimidation of, efforts to exercise control over, and limitation of access to witnesses who might testify against him."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
Quote #2
"Epstein’s efforts to intimidate his victims support the inference that Epstein knew that they were going to provide compelling testimony against him."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
Quote #3
"The evidence that Epstein tampered with witnesses (later designated as his accomplices and co-conspirators) will be admissible to demonstrate his consciousness of guilt."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013390.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document