DOJ-OGR-00021757.jpg
671 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
671 KB
Summary
This legal document discusses an unusual co-conspirator clause in a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) related to Epstein. It reveals that Epstein's defense team initially proposed a broad immunity deal to protect third parties, including "four named female assistants" and other employees like Ms. Maxwell, from any future criminal charges related to the federal investigation. The Government found this proposal "unusual" and countered with a more limited offer confined to the Southern District of Florida.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Roberts |
Mentioned as someone the Government interviewed but elected not to call as a witness.
|
|
| Epstein |
Central figure in the discussion of an immunity deal that would have insulated him from criminal prosecutions.
|
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Epstein's employee |
Mentioned in a footnote as someone who would have been protected under the proposed immunity clause because she was E...
|
| four named female assistants | female assistants |
A group for whom the defense sought immunity from future criminal charges in the first iteration of the co-conspirato...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
Refers to the prosecuting authority that interviewed Virginia Roberts, described the NPA clause as unusual, and respo...
|
| SDFL | government agency |
Abbreviation for the Southern District of Florida, mentioned as the jurisdiction the defense sought immunity beyond.
|
| USAO | government agency |
Abbreviation for the United States Attorney's Office, mentioned in the context of the Government's draft proposal.
|
| a specific Epstein corporate entity | company |
Mentioned as part of the defense's proposed immunity clause, seeking to protect its employees.
|
Timeline (3 events)
The defense proposed the first iteration of a co-conspirator clause for a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to grant immunity to third parties.
Epstein's defense team
The Government responded to the defense's proposal with a draft proposal to resolve federal criminal liability for co-conspirators in the Southern District of Florida.
Southern District of Florida
The Government interviewed Virginia Roberts but chose not to call her as a witness.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the jurisdiction for which the Government's draft proposal would resolve federal criminal liability for ...
|
Relationships (2)
The document states in a footnote that "Ms. Maxwell would have been protected as she was Epstein’s employee."
The defense sought immunity for them in connection with their association with Epstein and his corporate entity, implying an employment or assistant relationship.
Key Quotes (2)
"unusual,” even “very unusual” and “pretty weird."Source
— the Government
(Describing the co-conspirator clause in the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).)
DOJ-OGR-00021757.jpg
Quote #1
"preclude[d] the initiation of any and all criminal charges which might otherwise in the future be brought against [four named female assistants] or any employee of [a specific Epstein corporate entity] for any criminal charge that arises out of the ongoing federal investigation."Source
— the defense
(A quote from the first iteration of the co-conspirator clause proposed by the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00021757.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document