DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
803 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
803 KB
Summary
This document is a letter dated July 21, 2020, from attorney Jeffrey Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. On behalf of his client, Ghislaine Maxwell, Pagliuca requests a court order to prohibit the government and its agents from making extrajudicial statements about her case. The letter argues that such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by an impartial jury, citing legal precedents to support the court's authority to issue such an order.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Pagliuca | Attorney |
Author of the letter, representing Ghislaine Maxwell from the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, addressed as 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan' of the United States District Court, Southern ...
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Client/Defendant |
The client on whose behalf the letter is written, defendant in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'.
|
| DePasquale |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Gannett Co. v. DePasquale, 443 U.S. 368, 378 (1979)'.
|
|
| Sheppard |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333, 363 (1966)'.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C | Law firm |
The law firm represented by Jeffrey Pagliuca, sending the letter on behalf of their client.
|
| United States District Court, Southern District of New York | Government agency |
The court where Judge Alison J. Nathan presides and where the case is being heard.
|
| The Government | Government agency |
Refers to the prosecution in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically the United States.
|
| Supreme Court | Government agency |
Cited as having directed trial judges on handling pretrial publicity.
|
| Gannett Co. | Company |
Mentioned in the case citation 'Gannett Co. v. DePasquale'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-07-21
Filing of a letter requesting an order to prohibit extrajudicial statements.
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case No. 20 Cr. 330 (AJN).
United States District Court, Southern District of New York
United States
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The address of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
|
|
The city and state of the law firm Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
|
|
The address of the United States District Court, Southern District of New York.
|
|
|
The city and state of the United States District Court.
|
|
|
The specific federal court district where the case is filed.
|
Relationships (2)
The letter states, "On behalf of our client, Ghislaine Maxwell, we write to request...", indicating a lawyer-client relationship.
The document is a filing in the criminal case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', where Maxwell is the defendant and the United States is the prosecution.
Key Quotes (2)
"an affirmative constitutional duty to minimize the effects of prejudicial pretrial publicity."Source
— Gannett Co. v. DePasquale
(Cited to argue that the Court has a duty to safeguard the due process rights of the accused.)
DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
Quote #1
"such steps by rule and regulation that will protect their processes from prejudicial outside interferences. Neither prosecutors, counsel for defense, the accused, witnesses, court staff nor enforcement officers coming under the jurisdiction of the court should be permitted to frustrate its function."Source
— Sheppard v. Maxwell
(Cited from a Supreme Court case to support the argument that trial judges should prevent prejudicial publicity.)
DOJ-OGR-00019490.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document