DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
732 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
732 KB
Summary
This legal document argues against the release of grand jury transcripts in the pending case of Maxwell. The author contends that secrecy is necessary to protect still-living witnesses, including active law enforcement personnel and alleged victims. The document also refutes the government's cited precedent, the Rosenberg case, arguing it is inapplicable because it involved a decades-old, concluded case, unlike Maxwell's ongoing one.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the legal case, whose legal and reputational interests are at stake regarding grand jury materials from he...
|
| Julius Rosenberg | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.
|
| Ethel Rosenberg | Defendant in a cited case |
Mentioned as the subject of a decades-old grand jury proceeding related to espionage.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FBI | Government agency |
The Federal Bureau of Investigation, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
|
| NYPD | Government agency |
The New York Police Department, where law enforcement witnesses who testified before the grand jury remain active.
|
| National Security Archive | Non-profit |
A non-profit organization whose petition in a previous case (In re Petition of National Security Archive) is cited.
|
| MARKUS/MOSS | Law firm |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the law firm that authored the filing.
|
Timeline (4 events)
1951
The trial of Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, where they were convicted and sentenced to death.
2015
A motion by a non-profit (National Security Archive) regarding the Rosenberg grand jury proceeding.
S.D.N.Y.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The Southern District of New York, mentioned in a legal citation (S.D.N.Y. 2015).
|
Relationships (1)
The document outlines a legal dispute between Maxwell's counsel and the government regarding the disclosure of grand jury materials in her criminal case.
Key Quotes (2)
"aspects and subject matters of the transcript became public during Maxwell’s trial"Source
— The government's memorandum
(A statement from the government's memorandum cited in the document to argue that while some information is public, Maxwell has not seen the full materials.)
DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
Quote #1
"many"Source
— The government's memorandum
(Used to describe the number of complaining witnesses who are still alive, as disclosed in the government's memorandum.)
DOJ-OGR-00015091.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document