DOJ-OGR-00000191.tif

42.5 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

0
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal/internal report excerpt
File Size: 42.5 KB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a legal or internal report, likely from the Department of Justice, numbered 128a and bearing the identifier DOJ-OGR-00000191. It discusses the Office of Professional Responsibility's (OPR) finding that a U.S. Attorney's Office's (USAO) agreement not to prosecute unidentified 'potential co-conspirators' did not violate a clear and unambiguous Department policy or constitute professional misconduct, despite witnesses' assertions that it amounted to prohibited 'transactional immunity'.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
OPR
Office of Professional Responsibility, investigating prosecutorial conduct
USAO
United States Attorney's Office, subject of the investigation
Department
Likely refers to Department of Justice

Timeline (1 events)

OPR review of USAO's agreement not to prosecute "potential co-conspirators" and whether it violated Department policy or constituted professional misconduct.

Relationships (1)

USAO subject of investigation by OPR
OPR investigated the USAO's agreement

Key Quotes (4)

"The USAO's Agreement Not to Prosecute Unidentified "Potential Co-Conspirators" Did Not Violate a Clear and Unambiguous Department Policy"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000191.tif
Quote #1
"Several witnesses told OPR that they believed the government's agreement not to prosecute unidentified "potential co-conspirators" amounted to "transactional immunity," which the witnesses asserted is prohibited by Department policy."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000191.tif
Quote #2
"OPR found no policy prohibiting a U.S. Attorney from declining to prosecute third parties or providing transactional immunity."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000191.tif
Quote #3
"OPR found no clear and unambiguous standard that was violated by the USAO's agreement not to prosecute "potential co-conspirators," and therefore cannot conclude that negotiating or approving this provision violated a clear"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000191.tif
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document