DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg

698 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 698 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is a page from a court filing that argues about the scope of plea agreements. It discusses whether a plea agreement made with a U.S. Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district can prevent prosecutions in other districts, citing several legal precedents like United States v. Alessi and United States v. Russo. The document uses Leslie Groff, an assistant to Epstein, as an example and analyzes factors such as whether other USAOs or the Department of Justice were involved in the negotiations.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Epstein
Mentioned as the employer of Leslie Groff at his New York office.
Leslie Groff assistant
Cited as an example of an assistant who worked for Epstein out of his New York office.
Doe Plaintiff
Mentioned in the case name Doe v. Indyke et al.
Indyke Defendant
Mentioned in the case name Doe v. Indyke et al.
Alessi Defendant
Mentioned in the case name United States v. Alessi.
Russo Defendant
Mentioned in the case name United States v. Russo.
D’Amico Defendant
Mentioned in the case name United States v. D’Amico.
Laskow Defendant
Mentioned in the case name United States v. Laskow.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USAO government agency
Mentioned in the context of a USAO negotiating a plea agreement and its authority to bind other USAOs.
Department of Justice government agency
Mentioned as the parent organization of USAOs.
SDNY USAO government agency
Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney's Office, mentioned as not being consulted or involved in plea negotiatio...

Timeline (2 events)

The document discusses the nature of plea negotiations between a defendant and a prosecutor, specifically whether they can bind other districts.
defendant prosecutor USAO
An investigation was taking place in the Eastern District at the time a plea was being negotiated in the Central District, as cited in the Laskow case.
Eastern District

Locations (6)

Location Context
Epstein's office where Leslie Groff worked.
Southern District of Florida, location of the Doe v. Indyke et al. case.
Southern District of New York, location of the United States v. D’Amico case.
Eastern District of New York, location of the United States v. Laskow case.
Mentioned in the Laskow case as the district where a plea was negotiated without knowledge of an investigation in the...
Mentioned in the Laskow case as the location of an investigation unknown to the Central District.

Relationships (1)

Leslie Groff professional Epstein
The document states, "Leslie Groff worked for Epstein out of the New York Office."

Key Quotes (3)

"A promise to bind other districts can be inferred from the negotiations between defendant and prosecutor."
Source
— United States v. Russo, 801 F.2d 624, 626 (2d Cir. 1986) (A quote from a legal precedent supporting the idea that a promise to bind other districts does not need to be explicit.)
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
Quote #1
"offers no meaningful support for his claim that he ‘reasonably understood’ the Agreement to bar subsequent prosecutions in this District. . . . He does not claim, for example, that the SDNY USAO was in any way consulted or involved in the plea negotiations."
Source
— United States v. D’Amico, 734 F. Supp. 2d 321, 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2010) (A finding from a case used as an example of factors to consider, specifically the involvement of other USAOs in a plea agreement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
Quote #2
"defendants concede [] that the Central District had no knowledge of the investigation that was taking place in the Eastern District at the time the Central District plea was being negotiated. . . . The Central District, unaware of defendants’ potential criminal liability in the Eastern District, could not have"
Source
— United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y.) (A quote from a case illustrating that a district cannot bind another district regarding criminal liability it is unaware of.)
DOJ-OGR-00021097.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document