HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
1.52 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript (rough draft)
File Size:
1.52 MB
Summary
This document is page 19 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness explains a technical word processing error that caused a 'star footnote' to disappear from a legal filing (a joinder motion) near the University of Utah signature block. The questioner presses the witness on whether this error made it appear as though the University of Utah was endorsing the pleading, to which the witness begins to disagree.
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| University of Utah |
Mentioned in the context of a signature block on a legal document.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (1)
Speaker A was responsible for filing a document that included a University of Utah signature block.
Key Quotes (4)
"one of the problems with the Word processing program to drop a star footnote is it requires... different sections"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
Quote #1
"put in a footnote where the University of Utah signature block is, for example, it becomes footnote 2"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
Quote #2
"I realized that the star footnote had dropped off, so I filed a corrected pleading"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
Quote #3
"You would agree with me that a fair-minded, a reasonable reader... could conclude that the University of Utah was somehow endorsing or standing behind this pleading?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document