Speaker A
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
University of Utah
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Stepbrother's friend
|
Family |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
The Dean
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a joinder motion where a footnote dropped off due to word processing issues. | Court filing (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a corrected pleading with the star footnote restored. | Court filing (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding legal ethics and a motion to strike. | Unknown | View |
| 2022-03-11 | N/A | Court hearing/inquiry regarding juror responses to questionnaire items 48A and 49B. | Court | View |
| 2014-12-30 | N/A | The specific date referenced regarding when the witness (counsel) had to have a sufficient basis ... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00010228.jpg
This document is page 13 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330. It features a dialogue between a judge ('Q') and a juror ('A') regarding the juror's failure to disclose a stepbrother's criminal history on a questionnaire (specifically questions 48A and 49B). The juror explains the omission was because they didn't initially consider the stepbrother 'family' but affirms that this history would not affect their ability to serve impartially.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021873.jpg
This document is page 50 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The deponent (likely an attorney for Virginia Roberts) is being questioned about the basis for allegations made in a pleading filed on December 30th. The deponent states they relied on a West Palm Beach Police Department report containing 23-24 names and FBI information to assert that Alan Dershowitz abused Virginia Roberts and other underage minors, intending to find these individuals to testify about crimes committed against them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021850.jpg
This document is page 27 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight Committee investigation. The testimony involves a witness clarifying that while a specific police report does not directly state Professor Dershowitz abused anyone, it is part of a larger package of information suggesting his involvement in the sexual abuse of minor girls. The witness explicitly denies that mere friendship with Epstein or visiting Epstein's house is sufficient grounds to allege sexual abuse, rejecting the concept of 'guilt by association' in this context.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021847.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (House Oversight) containing a deposition. The witness confirms that 'Jane Doe Number 3' is Virginia Roberts (spelled Goufrey). The testimony discusses allegations that Professor Dershowitz abused Roberts and potentially other minors. The witness references an 89-page Palm Beach Police Department report that lists 23 or 24 minors who visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion during a six-month period in 2005.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021845.jpg
This document is page 22 of a rough draft legal deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. An attorney (Speaker A) is being questioned about the factual basis for allegations made in a pleading filed on December 30, 2014. The witness defends their actions, stating they firmly believe they had a sufficient basis for the filing, and mentions their history of pro bono work for crime victims and advice received from a 'dean' regarding legal footnotes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021842.jpg
This document is page 19 of a rough draft deposition transcript. A witness explains a technical word processing error that caused a 'star footnote' to disappear from a legal filing (a joinder motion) near the University of Utah signature block. The questioner presses the witness on whether this error made it appear as though the University of Utah was endorsing the pleading, to which the witness begins to disagree.
Juror Questionnaire Responses
Discussion regarding questions 48A and 49B on a juror questionnaire and the juror's impartiality.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity