University of Utah
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Witness (A)
|
Professional affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
THE WITNESS (Deponent)
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Speaker A
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Professional pro bono |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Employment |
5
|
1 |
024.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated November 23, 2010, in the case of M.J. vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Judge William P. Dimitrouleas granted a motion allowing attorney Paul G. Cassell to appear on behalf of the Plaintiff and receive electronic filings.
032-01.pdf
This document is a legal declaration filed on March 13, 2017, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Attorney Paul G. Cassell submits this declaration to support his application for admission Pro Hac Vice to represent the plaintiff, Bradley J. Edwards, in his case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Cassell attests to his clean legal record, stating he has no felony convictions or disciplinary actions against him and is a member in good standing of the Utah bar.
010-05.pdf
This document is a civil complaint filed on January 6, 2015, in Broward County, Florida, by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell against Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs allege that Dershowitz defamed them in media interviews (specifically on CNN) by accusing them of misconduct and lying after they filed court pleadings alleging Dershowitz participated in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal conduct. The complaint asserts that Dershowitz's statements were false, malicious, and intended to distract from his own alleged involvement in Epstein's crimes and the negotiation of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
001-01.pdf
Legal declaration by attorney Bradley J. Edwards filed on June 13, 2016, in support of a motion to quash a subpoena from Ghislaine Maxwell. Edwards details his representation of Virginia Giuffre and the undue burden of reviewing over 200,000 emails for communications with journalists. He explicitly states that Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein share a joint defense agreement and mentions Giuffre's association with the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.'
EFTA00030231.pdf
This document is an email dated June 26, 2019, forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Gov't Says Epstein Victims Can't Scrap Nonprosecution Deal.' The article details the federal government's response to a lawsuit by Epstein's victims (Doe v. U.S.), where prosecutors argued that while the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA) was violated by Alexander Acosta in 2008, the nonprosecution agreement cannot be undone. The government proposed a meeting and a public hearing for victims to be heard, a remedy the victims' lawyer Brad Edwards criticized as insufficient.
EFTA00027770.pdf
This document is an email from May 2019 forwarding a Law360 article titled 'Epstein Victims Demand Apology From Prosecutors'. The article details how two victims (Jane Does) requested a Florida federal court to nullify the 2008 non-prosecution agreement signed by then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, arguing it violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The victims sought nullification of the deal, a reopening of the criminal case, an apology, and a hearing with Acosta and Epstein present.
EFTA00014133.pdf
An email exchange between Paul Cassell (representing victims) and the US Attorney's Office (USAFLS) regarding the wording of a protective order. The order concerns the disclosure of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) to the victims. Cassell urges speed, citing government representations that 'Epstein is trying to ignore the agreement,' and negotiates the timing of when victims must sign acknowledgments of the protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00015246.tif
This document is a list of academic institutions, legal associations, and other organizations, along with events, grouped by year from 1974 to 1980. It appears to be a chronological record of affiliations, seminars, and conferences, potentially related to a professional's career or an institution's activities. The document also includes page numbering and a document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00015246'.
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
This document is a page from a legal transcript or filing where the speaker argues that a court must independently evaluate a government's motion to dismiss and is required to consider the victims' views before making a decision. The speaker cites the case of United States v. Heaton and the expert opinion of former Judge Paul G. Cassell, who concluded that the Crime Victims' Rights Act gives victims broad rights in such matters. The speaker expresses full agreement with this viewpoint, despite some factual differences between the current case and the Heaton case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022139.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a book detailing legal proceedings and allegations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein. It discusses claims made by Virginia Roberts (Jane Doe 3) against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, and includes a denial statement from Buckingham Palace regarding the allegations against Prince Andrew.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017971.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz, primarily from Virginia Roberts' affidavit. It covers alleged sexual encounters, denials from those accused, legal actions including defamation lawsuits and settlements, and a brief mention of Epstein's sentencing hearing. The article highlights the controversy surrounding the allegations and the legal aftermath.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017822.jpg
This document is a court exhibit containing a Miami Herald article detailing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts regarding Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring. It discusses a defamation settlement where Dershowitz paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, despite his claims of vindication and an exonerating investigation by Louis Freeh. The text also references sealed emails and court motions to make these documents public.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017715.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2005 law review article by Paul G. Cassell titled 'Recognizing Victims in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure'. It discusses the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) of 2004 and proposes amendments to federal rules to better integrate victims into criminal proceedings. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' in the footer, suggesting it is part of a production related to congressional oversight, likely involving the Epstein case where the CVRA was a central legal issue.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017636.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2007 Utah Law Review article by Paul G. Cassell regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). It argues that proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are insufficient to protect victims. The document was likely produced by attorney David Schoen (whose name appears in the footer) to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017636'. This is relevant to the Epstein case as the CVRA was the central statute invoked regarding the failure to notify victims of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017604.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 legal article published in the Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a key attorney for Epstein victims). The article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during criminal investigations before charges are filed, explicitly referencing a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights due to the DOJ's narrow interpretation. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp and the name David Schoen, indicating it was part of a production to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018043.jpg
A Miami Herald article included as a court exhibit discussing allegations against Alan Dershowitz by Sarah Ransome and Virginia Roberts. It details a defamation settlement where Dershowitz reportedly paid $900,000 to Roberts' lawyers, Edwards and Cassell, and mentions mentions Ransome's claims involving high-profile figures like the Clintons and Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015582.jpg
An email exchange between attorney Paul Cassell and Michael Bilton (likely a journalist) from January 2015. Bilton confirms sending files analyzing Virginia Roberts' (VR) travel coinciding with Prince Andrew's engagements. Cassell acknowledges receipt and shares a Gawker article discussing flight logs linking Clinton and Dershowitz to the case, expressing hope that the truth will come out.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015030.jpg
This document is page 3 of 4 of a printed web article from the Palm Beach Post, dated September 27, 2017. It details legal arguments by attorneys Edwards and Cassell, who are urging Judge Marra to rule that federal prosecutors violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The document discusses potential remedies, including restitution and legal fees, while Cassell emphasizes that the effort is about justice rather than money. The page also includes unrelated local news sidebars about the Wellington council and a cold-case arrest.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013468.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards outlines his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña, alleging that the prosecution failed to inform him of a secret non-prosecution agreement and withheld evidence despite admitting to having proof of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit highlights the timeline of the plea deal and the subsequent revelation that federal prosecution would be blocked.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013363.jpg
This document is an affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards detailing his representation of three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) against Jeffrey Epstein in 2008. Edwards describes his interactions with AUSA Marie Villafaña, alleging that the U.S. Attorney's Office withheld critical information regarding a plea agreement that blocked federal prosecution, despite admitting they had evidence of Epstein molesting at least 40 minors. The affidavit outlines the timeline of the plea deal revelation in June and July 2008.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013494.tif
This affidavit by attorney Bradley James Edwards details his representation of victims of Jeffrey Epstein in 2008, including the filing of state and federal lawsuits. It highlights his interactions with Assistant U.S. Attorney Marie Villafaña regarding Epstein's plea agreement and concerns that information about the federal prosecution implications of the state plea was not fully disclosed to his clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016202.jpg
This document is the final page (page 6) of a sworn declaration by Paul G. Cassell, Esq., filed on July 3, 2019, in the civil case Giuffre v. Maxwell (implied by case number). Cassell asserts that a bar complaint filed by Alan Dershowitz against attorneys Boies and McCawley is frivolous and praises McCawley's devotion to representing sexual abuse victims. The document is notarized in Salt Lake County, Utah, and bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014088.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) dated March 24, 2015, submitted by attorneys Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell on behalf of Jane Does No. 1-4. The text argues that the Court should deny Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene, citing his conflicting positions regarding the possession and collection of records. The document includes contact information for the attorneys and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014038.jpg
This document is the first page of a 2014 law review article titled 'Crime Victims' Rights During Criminal Investigations?' published in The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology. Co-authored by Bradley J. Edwards (a prominent attorney for Epstein victims), Paul Cassell, and Nathanael Mitchell, the article argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) should apply during the investigation phase, contrary to a DOJ memorandum. The text alludes to a 'notorious federal sex abuse case' (referencing the Epstein case) where victims were deprived of rights before charges were filed.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity