DOJ-OGR-00005586.jpg
806 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
806 KB
Summary
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, arguing against the defense's attempts to introduce certain evidence. The prosecution contends that a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein is irrelevant to the current case and that the fact the defendant was not charged by the USAO-SDFL after a Florida investigation is not admissible to challenge the credibility of Minor Victim-4. The document suggests that introducing these elements would mislead the jury and open the door to rebuttal from the government about the circumstances of the prior investigation.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as a party to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with a U.S. Attorney's Office.
|
|
| Minor Victim-4 | Victim/Witness |
The subject of a section discussing the relevance of the defendant not being charged by the USAO-SDFL to her credibil...
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal proceedings. The document discusses the defense's arguments regarding evidence and the defen...
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney’s Office | Government agency |
Mentioned as having an agreement (NPA) with Epstein that resolved an investigation.
|
| USAO-SDFL | Government agency |
The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, which did not charge the defendant after the Florida...
|
| FBI | Government agency |
Mentioned as having interviewed Minor Victim-4.
|
| Government | Government entity |
Refers to the prosecution, which is permitted to rebut the defense's arguments.
|
Timeline (4 events)
An investigation in New York, which the defense wants to introduce arguments about.
New York
A Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was made between Epstein and a U.S. Attorney's Office.
Minor Victim-4 was interviewed by the FBI and, according to the defense, did not implicate the defendant.
Relationships (2)
The document states there was a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) between Epstein and a U.S. Attorney's Office.
The defense argues that Minor Victim-4's credibility is questionable because she was interviewed by the FBI and did not implicate the defendant at that time.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document