EFTA00016464.pdf

54.4 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 54.4 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from December 2020 between USANYS contractors and legal staff regarding the management of digital evidence in the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details the separation of search warrant returns within the Relativity database, specifically requesting to lock down 397,365 non-responsive documents while keeping 1,218,719 'Identified Responsive' documents accessible for the prosecution team.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Redacted (USANYS) [Contractor] Contractor/Sender
Managing data organization in Relativity software for USANYS.
Redacted (USANYS) Legal Staff/Recipient
CC'd on the correspondence regarding the Maxwell/Epstein case data.
Redacted Sender (Original Email)
Requesting lockdown of non-responsive documents after review completion.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (prosecuting authority).
PAE
Likely the litigation support vendor hosting the Relativity instance (inferred from URL: d1pe.nss.pae.com).
FBI
Mentioned in folder structure "New_Search Warrant Returns_FBI".

Timeline (1 events)

2020-12-04
Completion of responsiveness review in the 'US v Epstein (SW Returns)' database.
Relativity Database
USANYS Legal Team

Relationships (1)

USANYS Contractor Professional/Service Provider Legal Team (Redacted)
Email exchange regarding technical database management for legal case.

Key Quotes (3)

"Would it be possible to please lock off access to the 397,365 documents in that database that are NOT currently tagged 'Identified Responsive'?"
Source
EFTA00016464.pdf
Quote #1
"That should leave just the 1,218,719 documents that are tagged 'Identified Responsive' accessible to the team for use in our case."
Source
EFTA00016464.pdf
Quote #2
"US v. Epstein (SW Returns) - Potentially Non-Responsive"
Source
EFTA00016464.pdf
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document