Redacted (USANYS)
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Redacted (External/Colleague)
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Redacted (AUSA)
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Participants]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | N/A | USANYS official called the tipster to verify the subject of the information. | Phone Call | View |
| 2021-03-26 | N/A | Epstein FOIA Moot | Unknown | View |
| 2019-04-29 | N/A | Meeting regarding the Epstein case (referred to as 'meeting with [Redacted] on Monday'). | Unknown | View |
EFTA00037005.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 13, 2021, involving USANYS and FBI officials discussing a tip received from an individual writing on behalf of an incarcerated friend. The inmate claims to have information helpful to the 'Maxwell/Epstein' case regarding a man living 'across the pond.' The USANYS verified the relevance of the tip via phone and forwarded the information to the FBI.
EFTA00035549.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 7, 2019, the day after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest. US Attorney's Office (USANYS) personnel are coordinating to resolve an issue where Epstein's attorney, Martin Weinberg, was denied entry to the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) to meet his client because he is barred in Massachusetts (out-of-state). The emails confirm Weinberg's good standing and grant permission for the visit ahead of Epstein's indictment presentment scheduled for the following day.
EFTA00032799.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails coordinate logistics for an October 21 teleconference and a November 1 in-person pretrial conference. The defense requests phone access for the November 1 hearing because an individual (likely a lawyer or witness/defendant) cannot be in NYC, and requests additional 'prep times' to get ready for trial.
EFTA00032790.pdf
This document is an email chain from April 16, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York regarding 'AJN Order - Pretrial Motions'. The subject likely refers to Judge Alison J. Nathan and the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The correspondence discusses proposed redactions (Exhibit 11) per an order, though the specific content of the emails is entirely redacted.
EFTA00032771.pdf
An email dated April 21, 2021, from a government official (likely US Attorney's Office SDNY) regarding a draft response letter to a court order ('Letter/suppression issue'). The email attaches a document titled '2021-04-21_Gov't_response_to_April_19_Order.docx' and indicates a filing deadline of 5:00 PM that day. The names of the sender and recipients are largely redacted.
EFTA00032480.pdf
An email thread from October 2020 involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the logistical planning and approval required for two Assistant US Attorneys (AUSAs) to travel to London during the COVID-19 pandemic. The emails discuss the need for EOUSA approval, 'Fly America Act' exceptions, and difficulties obtaining official passports due to State Department restrictions.
EFTA00032104.pdf
This document is a lengthy email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY CART team regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence highlights significant technical difficulties, including issues with Mac APFS formatting, the volume of data (one item with 500k emails), and friction between the agencies regarding the format of data for the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform. The USANYS expresses frustration with FBI delays and errors, eventually seeking budget approval ($85k-135k) to hire an outside vendor (BRG) to process the data instead of the FBI. The documents also mention a previous 2007 search and the deletion of 400TB of old FBI network data during a system upgrade in Feb 2020.
EFTA00032065.pdf
This document is an email thread between the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) and the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding the processing of massive amounts of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The discussion highlights technical difficulties in transferring terabytes of data, issues with file compatibility between forensic tools and the 'Relativity' review platform, and delays caused by FBI network upgrades. It lists specific hardware seized, including servers, laptops, and hard drives (some dating back to a 2007 search), but does not contain actual flight logs or passenger manifests.
EFTA00031947.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 9, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The emails discuss the FBI's review of images from 'Epstein devices' and a 'CART issue' (likely Computer Analysis Response Team). The team coordinates a conference call to discuss an update received regarding the progress of this evidence review.
EFTA00031378.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 3-6, 2018, coordinating the start of a 'New Investigation' involving the US Attorney's Office (SDNY), FBI, and the NYPD Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force. The emails discuss scheduling an initial strategy meeting and confirm the transfer of critical evidence, specifically listing attachments for '<Palm Beach Police Reports.pdf>', '<Epstein Blackbook.pdf>', and '<Flight Logs.pdf>'. One email notes that the FBI agents involved were assigned to the case 'yesterday' (Dec 3, 2018), marking the specific beginning of this investigative phase.
EFTA00030563.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2020 between members of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The discussion concerns drafting a response to a 'Rule 16/Brady Letter' received from an opposing party (implied to be defense counsel) on October 13, 2020. The emails coordinate edits to the draft response among the prosecution team.
EFTA00029950.pdf
An email chain between US Attorney's Offices (NY Southern and likely GA Northern) dated March 30, 2021. The officials are discussing a notification from Westlaw regarding an application to unseal civil discovery materials related to Jeffrey Epstein (Reference No. 2018R01618). One official notes it is 'weird' that the order says it is sealed despite being publicly available on Westlaw.
EFTA00029634.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 24, 2020, involving employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the urgent collection of questionnaires for 'Official Foreign Travel' to Stockholm in 2020. One sender expresses concern regarding their passport having only five months remaining before expiration.
EFTA00029616.pdf
This document is an internal email chain from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated March 13, 2020. It forwards a press inquiry from Mark Hookham of The Mail on Sunday, who is asking if US authorities (SDNY or FBI) have been informed about a new report filed with the Metropolitan Police in London regarding a sexual assault by Jeffrey Epstein. The internal USANYS response indicates they intend to decline comment.
EFTA00029527.pdf
This document is an email chain from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) regarding a contract with CACI for document scanning services related to the 'US v. Maxwell Epstein' case. The correspondence, dated between March and June 2021, confirms the initial task order and subsequently discusses closing the contract as the services were no longer needed. The document lists specific task order numbers (15JA5421F00000068) and reference numbers (R21NYS18013).
EFTA00029517.pdf
This document is an email chain dated October 8, 2020, between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The discussion centers on an individual named Sarah Sacks and whether she represents Jeffrey Epstein or Nicholas Tartaglione. The AUSA notes that FOIA production documents show Sacks arranging for a private investigator to visit 'her client,' despite her not filing a notice on the docket.
EFTA00029502.pdf
An email chain dated June 10, 2019, between personnel at USANYS (likely the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY). A contractor requests an 'Epstein meeting' on behalf of an unnamed 'Exec' for the following day. The meeting is successfully scheduled for 1:00 PM on June 11, 2019, and there is a request for relevant written materials to be sent in advance.
EFTA00029450.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from May and June 2019 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and the FBI. The correspondence concerns locating and contacting a female witness or subject in California who appears to be unrepresented by counsel. The emails discuss logistical details of making contact, including phone calls and a potential trip to California to interview her in person.
EFTA00029306.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 3-4, 2019, between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the FBI. The correspondence concerns 'Touhy requests' submitted by Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers. An AUSA in the Civil Division sought contact information for a specific FBI Point of Contact (POC) to discuss these requests, which the FBI subsequently provided.
EFTA00029250.pdf
This document is an email header dated February 1, 2021, sent between individuals at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The names and specific subject matter are redacted, but the email contains several embedded message files (.msg) as attachments. The document bears the Bates number EFTA00029250.
EFTA00028529.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2, 2019, between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and defense counsel regarding the filing of legal motions. The discussion centers on whether certain documents, specifically statements made to police and discovery materials involving cooperating witnesses, should be filed under seal or publicly. The prosecution notes that the defense violated a protective order by publicly filing sensitive exhibits related to cell tower data. The defense also mentions logistical issues with having their client (implied to be Jeffrey Epstein) sign an affidavit while incarcerated at the MCC due to notary restrictions.
EFTA00028458.pdf
This document is an email chain from late January 2020 between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and the Executive Office for US Attorneys (EOUSA). It coordinates official foreign travel for an Assistant US Attorney (AUSA) to Sweden, scheduled for February 4-6, 2020. The correspondence discusses logistical requirements including travel itineraries (Ref: HEZZTD), passport information, visa checks, and necessary approvals from the Office of International Affairs (OIA).
EFTA00027474.pdf
This document is a lengthy email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the FBI's NY Computer Analysis Response Team (CART) regarding the forensic processing of digital evidence seized from Jeffrey Epstein's properties in New York and the Virgin Islands. The correspondence reveals significant delays caused by technical incompatibility between FBI forensic tools and the US Attorney's review software (Relativity), as well as staffing shortages likely due to COVID-19. Key details include the existence of a specific Mac device containing over 500,000 emails, the seizure of Dell servers and Sony laptops, and the US Attorney's Office eventually seeking to hire a private vendor (BRG) for $85-135k to bypass FBI delays. A reference to 'flight records' on page 14 is a hypothetical example used to illustrate data linkage problems, not an actual flight log.
EFTA00027266.pdf
This document is an internal email chain between staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated August 11-12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. The emails discuss a Washington Post article reporting that officers watching Epstein were on overtime due to staffing shortages. The staff members confirm that this issue is in their 'outline' to discuss with the Warden the following day.
Re: Good news (and time sensitive request)
Accepting the honor and apologizing for the delay in seeing the message.
Good news (and time sensitive request)
Informing the agent of a nomination for the WIFLE award for work on the Maxwell case and requesting DOB/SSN for the application.
[EXTERNAL] IMPORTANT
Tipster writing on behalf of an incarcerated friend who has information about 'a guy that lives across the pond' relevant to the case.
Fwd: [EXTERNAL] IMPORTANT
Asking if this is a Maxwell reference and proposing to contact the sender.
RE: [EXTERNAL] IMPORTANT
Confirming a phone call was made and the case referred to is Maxwell/Epstein.
Re: Ghislaine Maxwell Victim Update
Discussion regarding updating the US DOJ website with information about victim attendance at the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, including specific text to be posted.
[Redacted]
Transmission of attachment: ATTORNEY_NARRATIVE_8_28_20_Epstein_VCP_Claim_Submission_Redacted.pdf
RE: Voice Message Attached from [Redacted] - WIRELESS CALLER
Confirming protocol to forward tips to FBI and that case agents are logging them.
FW: Voice Message Attached from [Redacted] - WIRELESS CALLER
Forwarding voicemail from individual claiming info on Ghislaine Maxwell and connection to George Soros. Asks if crime reporting materials should be sent.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Confirming correction of cover letter regarding Bates numbers; providing FedEx tracking numbers for hard drives sent to Colorado office and MDC; noting upload to USAfx.
RE: US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Inquiry about missing Bates numbers 2774105-2774194 in the discovery letter.
US v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Notification of additional discovery production (testifying and non-testifying witness material); asking for delivery preferences (pickup vs FedEx) for counsel and Ms. Maxwell at MDC.
Phone Numbers Searched in Relativity
Update on querying phone numbers in Relativity database. Notes completion of first 4 numbers, mentions 'hits' vs 'exact matches', and outlines file organization (US vs Epstein as 'JE').
FW: United States v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330, juror questionn...
Forwarding an email regarding a joint letter for juror questionnaires.
RE: questionnaires
Sender attaches a draft of a joint letter and notes they have joined the defense's position on specific prospective jurors (list of numbers included).
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Checking in to see if compiled lists are ready for review.
RE: questionnaires
Acknowledges receipt and attaches their list.
[EXTERNAL] RE: questionnaires
Asks when the prosecution is ready to exchange the last batch of juror questionnaire positions. Notes they prepared theirs in Excel for easier import.
FW: Amazon return
Discussing whether to mark Amazon returns as confidential and unmarking the letter.
FW: letter referencing Ghislaine Maxwell
Request to add the forwarded email to 'NTW 3500'.
letter referencing Ghislaine Maxwell
Forwarding citizen correspondence referencing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Noting that the writer will be advised to contact the FBI.
RE: Daubert motion
Providing small edits, deferring on bigger picture. Praises the work.
RE: Daubert motion
Sending version with Loftus section. Plan to have draft in chiefs' inbox by morning. Writing Rocchio section next.
Bail Oppo Draft
Sender submits 'Bail_Oppo_v1.docx' for review, noting they saved it locally to avoid messing up shared organization.
[EXTERNAL] Ghislaine Maxwell Atty Likens Jail To 'Silence...
News alert regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney comparing her prison conditions to Hannibal Lecter's.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity