HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017832.jpg

2.08 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal case law / court opinion headnotes
File Size: 2.08 MB
Summary

This document is a page of legal headnotes from the case 'In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' (349 F.Supp.2d 765), dated 2005. It outlines legal standards regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), jurisdiction, and the immunity of foreign officials, specifically mentioning the Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a Congressional document production, potentially related to investigations into 9/11 or financial oversight, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence Defendant/Official
Found immune from Antiterrorism Act suit.
Bank Chairman Defendant
Survivors stated a cause of action against this individual under the ATA.
Survivors Plaintiffs
Survivors of victims of September 11 attacks bringing suit.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Department of General Intelligence (DGI)
Saudi Arabia's intelligence agency.
United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.)
The court issuing the opinion.
Second Circuit
Court of Appeals whose law binds the District Court.
Multidistrict Litigation Panel
Body responsible for transferring cases.

Timeline (1 events)

September 11, 2001
Terrorist Attacks
Implied (United States)
Survivors Victims

Locations (3)

Location Context
Foreign state mentioned regarding sovereign immunity.
Mentioned regarding choice of law.
Jurisdiction of courts.

Relationships (2)

Survivors Legal Adversaries Director of Saudi Arabia's DGI
Suit by survivors against Director (found immune).
Survivors Legal Adversaries Bank Chairman
Survivors stated cause of action against bank chairman.

Key Quotes (2)

"Director of Saudi Arabia's Department of General Intelligence (DGI) was immune from Antiterrorism Act (ATA) suit by survivors of victims of Septem-"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017832.jpg
Quote #1
"A delicate balance exists between permitting discovery to substantiate exceptions to statutory foreign sovereign immunity and protecting a sovereign's or sovereign's agency's legitimate claim to immunity from discovery."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017832.jpg
Quote #2

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document