DOJ-OGR-00016500.jpg
600 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
600 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between counsel (Mr. Rohrbach) and the court. The parties discuss the potential testimony of Mr. Grumbridge regarding the ownership of a property called Stanhope Mews and agree to confer on a stipulation. The court then moves to address a government motion to exclude parts of the anticipated expert testimony of Dr. Loftus concerning suggestive investigative and therapeutic techniques.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Grumbridge | lawyer and solicitor |
Mentioned as having information about the Stanhope Mews ownership because he was the lawyer and solicitor involved in...
|
| ROHRBACH | Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, identified as MR. ROHRBACH, who is conferring with defense counsel and the court.
|
| Dr. Loftus | Expert |
An expert whose anticipated testimony on suggestive activities and therapist techniques is being discussed for exclus...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the recipient of records, the party seeking to exclude testimony, and the employer of investigators.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-11-21
The Court mentions a prior order from this date where a ruling was made.
Court
THE COURT
2022-08-10
A court hearing where parties discuss the inclusion of Mr. Grumbridge's testimony and the exclusion of Dr. Loftus's testimony.
Court
MR. ROHRBACH
THE COURT
defense counsel
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property whose ownership is a subject of discussion and potential testimony from Mr. Grumbridge.
|
Relationships (2)
He was the 'lawyer and solicitor involved' in the Stanhope Mews ownership transaction.
MR. ROHRBACH
→
professional
→
defense counsel
They are opposing counsel in a legal case, conferring on evidentiary matters ('We're happy to confer with defense counsel').
Key Quotes (2)
"We're happy to confer with defense counsel and try to work something out. I would just note that defense counsel has not produced any records to the government showing this prior ownership of Stanhope Mews."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Responding to the discussion about Mr. Grumbridge's testimony regarding Stanhope Mews.)
DOJ-OGR-00016500.jpg
Quote #1
"Moving on to the Dr. Loftus testimony. So I got the letter dated December 15th in which the government seeks to exclude two aspects of Dr. Loftus's anticipated expert testimony on suggestive activities: Her testimony on the use of leading questions by government investigators, and her anticipated testimony on the therapist technique of response pressure to provide more detail about a patient's experience."Source
— THE COURT
(Pivoting the discussion to a motion to exclude expert testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00016500.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document