ROHRBACH
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Besselsen
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The Court
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Brown
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Witness Mr. Besselsen is questioned about Government Exhibit 741, which contains letters between ... | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of witness Mr. Besselsen by attorney Mr. Rohrbach, involving the presentation ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination testimony of Mr. Besselsen in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislai... | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Besselsen regarding camper files and record keeping. | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibit 743 (GX-743) under seal. | Courtroom | View |
| 0022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing date of the transcript. | Courtroom (Southern Distric... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge and two lawyers, Mr. Rohrbach and Mr. Everdell. The conversation focuses on refining the language of a limiting instruction for a jury. The instruction pertains to testimony from a witness named Kate about alleged sexual conduct with someone named Epstein, with the judge clarifying that the government is specifically directed not to inquire about details unless the defense opens the door to such questions.
DOJ-OGR-00017864.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Besselsen, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. During the testimony, Mr. Rohrbach directs the witness and the jury to review two pieces of evidence, Government Exhibit 743 and Defense Exhibit J-4, with no objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00017859.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which a witness, Mr. Besselsen, describes the contents of Government Exhibit 741. The exhibit contains letters from Interlochen's vice president of advancement to Mr. Epstein concerning the construction of a "scholarship lodge" on the Interlochen campus. Besselsen confirms one letter thanks Epstein for a $200,000 donation towards this project and provides construction updates.
DOJ-OGR-00017851.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of Mr. Besselsen by Mr. Rohrbach. Besselsen identifies himself as the Assistant Vice President of Finance at Interlochen Center for the Arts in Michigan, where he has worked for 16 years, and describes the institution's nature as a nonprofit arts education organization.
DOJ-OGR-00008346.jpg
This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 10, 2021. It captures a legal discussion between the court and Mr. Rohrbach regarding the definition of 'illegal sexual activity' in an indictment involving Mr. Epstein. The conversation centers on whether events in New Mexico constitute a crime under the Mann Act and how they relate to proving intent for illegal activity in New York, particularly concerning conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'.
DOJ-OGR-00008340.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021. It captures a legal discussion between the judge and an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, concerning the precise wording of jury instructions. They specifically debate whether the defendant, Mr. Epstein, could be convicted 'solely' based on a witness's testimony, with both agreeing that such an instruction would be an incorrect statement of law and potentially a reversible error.
DOJ-OGR-00008337.jpg
This is a court transcript from a case filed on December 10, 2021, detailing a conversation between the judge and attorneys for the defense and government. The discussion focuses on whether the defense will call expert witnesses (LaPorte and Naso), with a defense attorney stating it's unlikely and was only considered as a precaution regarding 'Accuser No. 2'. A government attorney expresses concern about the potential for the defense to decide to call these experts in the middle of the trial.
DOJ-OGR-00008329.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 10, 2021. The judge and attorneys discuss procedural matters for an upcoming trial, agreeing to resolve a hearsay/relevance issue during the trial itself. The court then raises the issue of whether individuals disclosed by the defense, specifically Kelso and Lopez, should be considered fact witnesses rather than expert witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00018879.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a legal debate between attorneys Rohrbach and Sternheim before a judge regarding the admissibility of an insurance form containing a statement by a 'Mr. Roberts'. The discussion centers on whether the act of providing insurance and paying medical bills through Mar-a-Lago constitutes a course of conduct, and whether a witness can be questioned about practices that occurred before their time of involvement.
DOJ-OGR-00016235.jpg
This document is a page from the transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of Supervisory Investigator Brown by Mr. Rohrbach regarding Government Exhibit 21. The testimony establishes that a photo was taken and a nondriver ID was issued on April 28, 2004, for an unnamed individual born in 1985, highlighting that this person would have been 11 years old in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00019147.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. During the testimony, Government Exhibits are discussed and admitted into evidence, with Ms. Chapell identifying Exhibit 802 as an "Invoice on Jeffrey E. Epstein's account." The government then offers this exhibit under seal.
DOJ-OGR-00017019.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge and several attorneys regarding the logistics for closing arguments. The conversation focuses on procedures for handling redacted exhibits and presenting sealed video evidence exclusively to the jury, not on public screens. The judge also issues a directive that counsel must not orally refer to the real names of witnesses who testified under pseudonyms.
DOJ-OGR-00016500.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between counsel (Mr. Rohrbach) and the court. The parties discuss the potential testimony of Mr. Grumbridge regarding the ownership of a property called Stanhope Mews and agree to confer on a stipulation. The court then moves to address a government motion to exclude parts of the anticipated expert testimony of Dr. Loftus concerning suggestive investigative and therapeutic techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and opposing counsel (Ms. Menninger) regarding the scope of testimony for a witness named Mr. Flatley. The government agrees not to question Mr. Flatley about 'CDs' on direct examination, resolving the issue and making prior preparation on the topic moot for the time being.
DOJ-OGR-00013876.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between counsel and the judge regarding the admissibility of testimony. The parties discuss potential testimony from Mr. Grumbridge concerning the prior ownership of a property called Stanhope Mews. The court then addresses a government motion to exclude parts of Dr. Loftus's anticipated expert testimony on suggestive interview techniques.
DOJ-OGR-00013605.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of testimony in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, calls William Brown to the stand as a witness. After being sworn in, Mr. Brown states his name and testifies that he works for the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Division of Field Investigations.
DOJ-OGR-00013566.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Chapell, by an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach. The testimony focuses on an invoice, identified as Government Exhibit 801, where Ms. Chapell confirms that Jeffrey E. Epstein is the account holder. She further testifies that S. Kellen was the sender of a related package, with Epstein's name also appearing on it.
DOJ-OGR-00011657.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between Mr. Rohrbach and the presiding judge. The conversation centers on the legal definition of 'illegal sexual activity' within an indictment, specifically whether events in New Mexico and the intent for activity in New York satisfy the requirements of the Mann Act for conspiracy charges against 'minor Victim 2'. The judge expresses concern about potential jury confusion over the complex legal points being argued.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity