HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406.jpg

2.76 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
10
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal opinion / case law printout
File Size: 2.76 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal opinion (cited as 2012 WL 257568) regarding litigation related to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks ('In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001'). It discusses the dismissal of intentional tort claims (assault, battery, IIED), arguments regarding statutes of limitations in New York versus Virginia and Pennsylvania, and equitable tolling due to the clandestine nature of the conspiracy involving al-Qaeda. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406', indicating it was produced as part of a US House Oversight Committee investigation, likely included in a production by a financial institution or entity being investigated for connections to high-profile cases, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named in the text of this specific page.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Bovsun Legal Case Citation
Cited in Bovsun, 61 N.Y.2d at 233 regarding NIED.
Matson Legal Case Citation
Cited in Matson, 631 F.3d at 72 regarding dismissal standards.
Holmes Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Holmes v. Lorch.
Lorch Legal Case Citation
Defendant in cited case Holmes v. Lorch.
Neumeier Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Neumeier v. Kuehner.
Kuehner Legal Case Citation
Defendant in cited case Neumeier v. Kuehner.
Luddeke Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Luddeke v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.
Bougher Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Bougher v. Univ. of Pittsburgh.
Yeadon Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Yeadon v. New York Transit Auth.
Johnson Legal Case Citation
Plaintiff in cited case Johnson v. Nyack Hosp.

Organizations (10)

Name Type Context
al-Qaeda
Terrorist organization defendants are alleged to have materially supported.
Westlaw / Thomson Reuters
Publisher of the legal document.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406'.
Federal Ins.
Referenced as 'Federal Ins. plaintiffs'.
Lehman Bros. Special Fin., Inc.
Cited in case law.
Amana Refrigeration, Inc.
Cited in case law.
University of Pittsburgh
Cited in case law.
New York Transit Auth.
Cited in case law.
Nyack Hosp.
Cited in case law.
Fin. One Pub. Co.
Cited in case law.

Timeline (2 events)

2012
Legal Opinion/Case Proceeding
Legal Record
Plaintiffs Defendants Courts
September 11, 2001
Terrorist Attacks
United States
al-Qaeda victims

Locations (4)

Location Context
Jurisdiction and location of courts.
Location where some injuries occurred.
Location where some injuries occurred.
Target of terrorist attacks.

Relationships (2)

Plaintiffs (9/11 Families) Legal Adversaries Defendants
Plaintiffs pleaded that defendants materially supported al-Qaeda.
Defendants Alleged Conspirators/Supporters al-Qaeda
defendants’ knowing material support of al-Qaeda was instrumental

Key Quotes (3)

"plaintiffs -- many of them the surviving family members of 9/11 victims -- allege that the defendants’ knowing material support of al-Qaeda was instrumental in allowing the organization to develop and perpetrate the 9/11 attacks"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406.jpg
Quote #1
"The District Court Wrongly Dismissed the Intentional Tort Claims"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406.jpg
Quote #2
"Given the clandestine nature of the conspiracy in which the defendants participated, equitable principles require that the statute of limitations be tolled."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023406.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document