DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
1.36 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court docket / case log
File Size:
1.36 MB
Summary
This document is a court docket log from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events from July 30, 2020, to August 18, 2020. It details legal arguments regarding a protective order for discovery materials, specifically concerning witness privacy and the defense's ability to reference individuals. The log tracks the filing of motions, affidavits, and responses by defense attorneys (Everdell, Pagliuca) and the government (Rossmiller), as well as orders issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court case; filing motions and affidavits.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Judge issuing orders and endorsements in the Southern District of New York.
|
| Christian R. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing letter motions and affidavits on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Alex Rossmiller | Prosecutor (USA) |
Attorney filing letter responses in opposition on behalf of the USA.
|
| Jeffrey S. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Attorney filing a letter motion for permission to submit excess pages on behalf of Maxwell.
|
Organizations (4)
Timeline (3 events)
07/30/2020
Judge Alison J. Nathan signed an order adopting the Government's proposed protective order.
Southern District of New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
08/11/2020
Memo Endorsement by Judge Nathan ordering the Government to respond to Defendant's letter motion by Aug 13, 2020.
Southern District of New York
08/18/2020
Order regarding Defendant's motion to modify the Protective Order and file under seal.
Southern District of New York
Judge Alison J. Nathan
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Everdell, Christian)
Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey)
LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition by USA... from Alex Rossmiller
Key Quotes (3)
"The exception the Defense seeks is too broad and risks undermining the protections of the privacy of witnesses and alleged victims that is required by law."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
Quote #1
"Nothing in the Defense's papers explains how its unprecedented proposed restriction is somehow necessary to ensure a fair trial."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
Quote #2
"For the foregoing reasons, the Court adopts the Government's proposed protective order, which will be entered on the docket."Source
DOJ-OGR-00019781.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document