government
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-05-01 | N/A | Yemen peace talks (proposed) | Kuwait | View |
| 1996-01-01 | N/A | Enactment of Canada's Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (CDSA) | Canada | View |
| 1980-01-01 | N/A | Decision in Government of Virgin Islands v. Scotland | 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals | View |
EFTA00038379.pdf
This document is a handwritten list found in Jeffrey Epstein's files, categorizing various high-profile individuals into groups such as 'Politicians', 'Business', 'House Staff', and 'Academics'. The list includes notable figures like Peter Mandelson, Bill Richardson, Mort Zuckerman, and prominent scientists like Lawrence Krauss and Murray Gell-Mann. There is also a category for 'Charity Recipients' and mentions of 'Security', alongside a note about a letter from 'Governer Stefanie' and a name 'Acasta' (possibly Alexander Acosta).
EFTA00019989.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death, with the subject 'US v. Epstein'. The correspondence discusses the administrative processing of documents received from the FOIA office, noting that they have been uploaded to the 'Relativity' e-discovery platform and are likely duplicative of Florida case files already being processed. The names of the individuals communicating are redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00028696.jpg
This is a Department of Justice record (IO95 Inspection Comments) dated April 28, 2014, detailing a border entry. A redacted passenger (PAX) was processed, found to have no warrants, was confirmed to be registered at the same address, and was admitted as a US Citizen (USC) without incident.
DOJ-OGR-00008260.jpg
This is page 16 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on December 8, 2021. Ms. Comey clarifies procedural questions with the Court regarding the presence of supervisors in the witness room. Mr. Everdell (Defense) raises an issue regarding a 'Touhy request' submitted several weeks prior, seeking a witness from Customs and Border Protection to authenticate border crossing records, noting there are complications but hoping for a resolution or stipulation.
DOJ-OGR-00000885.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet for Case 21-770 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) covering proceedings from July 13, 2020, to July 27, 2020. Key events include Maxwell's arraignment where she pleaded Not Guilty, the denial of her bail, the setting of a trial date for July 12, 2021, and various orders regarding discovery scheduling and extrajudicial statements. The document records the presence of defense attorneys Mark Cohen, Jeffrey Pagliuca, and Christian Everdell, as well as government prosecutors Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00020703.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering entries from December 9 and 10, 2021. It details legal arguments over the admission of Government Exhibit 52 (GX 52), involving witness Juan Alessi, where Judge Nathan overruled defense objections. It also records minute entries for the jury trial proceedings on those dates and the filing of transcripts.
DOJ-OGR-00020701.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from the SDNY court case against Ghislaine Maxwell, covering dates from December 2, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding witness anonymity and juror transportation, and various correspondence regarding witnesses 'Jane', 'Michael Dawson', and 'Witness-3'. The document tracks the legal motions and daily trial activities involving the prosecution team, defense team, and Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020700.jpg
This document is a court docket page from the SDNY regarding US v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering events on November 29 and 30, 2021. It details the beginning of the jury trial, orders regarding the production of materials from the Epstein Victims Compensation Program, and the handling of witness privacy and pseudonyms. It lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020557.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering dates from November 30, 2021, to December 5, 2021. It records minute entries for jury trial proceedings, orders regarding the protection of witness identities (pseudonyms) and cross-examination limitations, and correspondence regarding specific witnesses including 'Witness Jane', 'Witness-3', and Michael Dawson. The document also includes administrative orders such as the payment of juror transportation invoices.
DOJ-OGR-00020530.jpg
This document is a docket sheet from July to August 2021 detailing legal maneuvers in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Significant entries involve a dispute over an Op-Ed written by attorney David Oscar Markus, leading to a court order enforcing Local Criminal Rule 23.1 regarding extrajudicial statements to protect the integrity of the trial. Additionally, the defense filed motions referencing the 'Cosby Opinion' and sought to suppress evidence obtained from a subpoena to the law firm Boies Schiller.
DOJ-OGR-00020514.jpg
This document is a page from the court docket for the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from March 31, 2021, to April 14, 2021. It details procedural events including the scheduling and rescheduling of an arraignment on a Second Superseding Indictment, the granting of Pro Hac Vice status to attorney Sigrid McCawley, and various letter motions regarding MDC conditions and subpoenas. It also includes a specific denial by Judge Nathan regarding a request for Maxwell to possess materials in courthouse cellblocks, citing US Marshal policy.
DOJ-OGR-00020474.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 detailing procedural filings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the submission and deadline protocols for victim impact statements under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). Submissions from both the defense (Bobbi Sternheim) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, et al.) are logged, primarily concerning victim notifications and objections to statements.
DOJ-OGR-00020457.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering entries from December 5 to December 9, 2021. It details daily jury trial proceedings, legal correspondence regarding evidence and witness testimony (specifically regarding 'Witness-3' and alleged sexual activity), and administrative orders such as juror reimbursement. The document lists the legal teams for both the defense and prosecution present during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00020405.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from December 2020 regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426). It details the denial of Maxwell's renewed motion for bail, with Judge Alison J. Nathan citing her as a clear flight risk and affirming that pretrial detention is warranted. The document also lists specific charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and sex trafficking, and outlines procedures for redactions to protect third-party privacy.
DOJ-OGR-00020393.jpg
This document is a court docket log from July 6-7, 2020, detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. It records the transfer of documents from New Hampshire and contains orders from Judge Alison J. Nathan scheduling an arraignment and bail hearing for July 14, 2020. The orders heavily reference COVID-19 protocols, including the use of remote video conferencing for the defendant (held at the Metropolitan Detention Center) and strict entry requirements for the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse.
DOJ-OGR-00002121.jpg
This document is Page 26 of a legal filing (Document 97-21) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 14, 2020. It contains a table summarizing procedural timelines and statutory rules under the UK's Extradition Act 2003, specifically detailing scenarios where a person consents to extradition versus those requiring a hearing. The document outlines the roles of the Secretary of State and the Extradition Judge in extending deadlines and ordering removal.
DOJ-OGR-00030591.jpg
This document appears to be the final page of a personal letter included in a Department of Justice public records release (FOIA request 17-295). The text captures the sender chiding the recipient for handling a situation in an 'impolite way' by sending a letter instead of a promised phone call, acknowledging the recipient's dislike of tension, and concluding with 'I remain your friend.' The specific identities of the sender and recipient are not visible on this page.
DOJ-OGR-00022057.jpg
A printout of a Government Executive article dated November 19, 2019, filed as a court document. The article details testimony by BOP Director Hawk Sawyer regarding staffing shortages ('augmentation') and the fallout from the Jeffrey Epstein suicide, including the indictment of two guards for falsifying records. Sawyer agrees with Senator Ted Cruz that the event was a 'black eye' for the agency but defends the majority of the staff.
DOJ-OGR-00021115.jpg
Page 68 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated February 28, 2023. The text presents a legal argument citing 'Landgraf v. USI Film Prods.' regarding the retroactive application of statutes. It specifically argues that the 2003 amendment to § 3283 cannot be applied retroactively by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00019407.jpg
This is page 8 of a 58-page legal document associated with Case 20-3061, filed on September 24, 2020. The entire substantive content of the page is fully redacted with black bars. The only visible text is the case header information and the footer containing the page number '3' and the document identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00019407'.
DOJ-OGR-00010531.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated June 21, 2022. The defense argues that the sentencing hearing should not be an 'open forum' for alleged victims who were not part of the trial record, specifically naming Ms. Ransome and Ms. Stein as individuals who should not qualify as 'crime victims' under the CVRA for this specific case. The letter distinguishes Maxwell's case from the abatement of the Epstein case and requests advance notice of who will be permitted to speak at sentencing.
DOJ-OGR-00031620.jpg
This document is a scanned image of a physical file folder tab labeled 'EPSTIEN PHONE' (note the misspelling). It appears to be page 3 of a 104-page release related to Public Records Request No. 17-295 from the Department of Justice, dated July 26, 2017.
DOJ-OGR-00031459.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice public records release (Request No. 17-295). It consists of a printout showing a URL for a JPEG image hosted on a Myspace content delivery network server. The image itself is printed on the page but is almost entirely black and unintelligible. The document bears dates from 2017 and 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00031380.jpg
This document is a scan of a file folder or evidence envelope tab labeled '-HALEY CELL -'. It features the handwritten notation 'Susp 12-28-02', likely referring to December 28, 2002. The document is part of a Department of Justice public records request release (No. 17-295) processed on 07/26/17.
DOJ-OGR-00031174.jpg
This document appears to be a cover page or file separator within a Department of Justice public records release (Request No. 17-295). It features a handwritten note referencing a 'DRAFT PC' related to Haley Robson. The document is dated July 26, 2017, likely referring to the processing date of the records request.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity