ALEX ROSSMILLER
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
9 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Sarah K. Eddy
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor government |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
USA/Government
|
Prosecutor |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Subordinate superior |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Judge Alison J. Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
USA (Government)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Gainfort Moe
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
U.S. Attorney’s Office, SDNY
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Opposing counsel adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Maurene Ryan Comey
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
U.S. Attorney’s office
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
USA
|
Prosecutor representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Meeting | The Government conferred in good faith with counsel for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, regardi... | N/A | View |
| 2021-11-10 | N/A | Status Conference | Courtroom 110, 40 Centre St... | View |
| 2021-04-01 | Court hearing | A court hearing for appearances of counsel in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2021-01-12 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 1-2 in Case 21-58. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-01-12 | N/A | Electronic delivery of court notice for Case 21-58 (related to criminal case 1:20-cr-00330). | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Legal filing | Document 41 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Court filing | LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA regarding Discovery Disclosure and Access. | District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-13 | Legal filing | LETTER RESPONSE in Opposition filed by USA (Alex Rossmiller) regarding discovery. | District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-10 | Meeting | Defense counsel conferred with Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding a disclosure request. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | AFFIDAVIT of Alex Rossmiller filed by USA. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | An affidavit by Alex Rossmiller was filed. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | LETTER RESPONSE to Motion filed by USA (Alex Rossmiller) regarding the Proposed Protective Order. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | Filing of an Affidavit of Certification by Alex Rossmiller in the case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | The U.S. Attorney's office filed a document arguing against a defendant's motion and in favor of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Legal filing | This document (Document 34) was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-28 | Court filing | A letter response to the motion on the Proposed Protective Order was filed by Alex Rossmiller for... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-27 | Legal filing | A court document was filed and ordered, showing agreement between the U.S. Attorney's office and ... | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-07-27 | Legal filing | The Government filed this letter requesting an opportunity to respond to the defense's motion. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell. Defendant entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied and de... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Court proceeding | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She pleaded not guilty, bail was denied, and she was rema... | Court (via video conference... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Ghislaine Maxwell was arraigned, pleaded Not Guilty to counts 1s-6s. Bail was denied, she was rem... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment held for Ghislaine Maxwell. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. Bail was denied, she wa... | S.D.N.Y. (via video confere... | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment. Defendant entered plea of Not Guilty. Trial set for July 12, 2021. | Video Conference / Telephone | View |
| 2020-07-14 | Arraignment | Arraignment for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1s,2s,3s,4s,5s-6s. She entered a plea of Not Guilty. ... | N/A | View |
| 2020-07-14 | N/A | Arraignment: Defendant enters plea of Not Guilty to S1 indictment. | Video Conference | View |
19-2221_Documents.pdf
This document contains a docketing notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding Jeffrey Epstein's appeal (19-2221) from a District Court decision (1:19-cr-490-1), dated July 23, 2019. It also includes the Notice of Appeal filed on July 22, 2019, detailing Epstein's legal representation and the pending charges of sex trafficking conspiracy and sex trafficking of children. The document lists multiple attorneys representing Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office representing the USA.
052.pdf
This document is a 'Nolle Prosequi' filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein due to his death on August 10, 2019. The order cites the rule of abatement as the legal basis for dismissal since Epstein died before a final judgment was issued. Judge Richard M. Berman signed the order on August 29, 2019, adding a handwritten note incorporating the transcript of an August 27 hearing and emphasizing the Crime Victims' Rights Act.
047.pdf
Formal letter from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey Berman to Judge Richard Berman dated August 19, 2019, confirming Jeffrey Epstein's death by suicide while in custody on August 10, 2019. The letter requests the court approve an order of nolle prosequi to dismiss the indictment due to the defendant's death and reaffirms the office's commitment to the victims.
047-01.pdf
This document is a Nolle Prosequi filed on August 19, 2019, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, formally dismissing the criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein. The dismissal cites the rule of abatement following Epstein's death on August 10, 2019, which occurred while the case was pending trial on charges of sex trafficking and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. The document is signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman.
038.pdf
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490). The order, signed by Judge Richard M. Berman, establishes strict protocols for handling discovery materials to protect the privacy of victims and uncharged individuals, specifically categorizing some materials as 'Confidential' or 'Highly Confidential' (including nude images). It prohibits the defendant and defense counsel from disseminating these materials to the public or posting them on the internet, and mandates that 'Highly Confidential' materials be reviewed by the defendant only in the presence of counsel.
030.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Richard Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The Government refutes the defense's claim that Epstein's Austrian passport was never used, stating it contains stamps showing travel to France, Spain, the UK, and Saudi Arabia in the 1980s. The prosecution also notes concerns that Epstein has not disclosed how he obtained the passport or if he holds foreign citizenship.
023.pdf
This July 16, 2019 letter from the DOJ to Judge Berman provides supplemental information for Jeffrey Epstein's detention hearing. It details suspicious wire transfers totaling $350,000 to two potential co-conspirators shortly after the release of Miami Herald articles in late 2018. The letter also reveals the seizure of a foreign passport with Epstein's photo but a false name, as well as over $70,000 in cash and 48 loose diamonds found in his Manhattan safe, arguing these facts support a serious risk of flight.
011.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. The Government outlines Epstein's extreme flight risk due to his wealth (over $500 million), international ties (Paris, US Virgin Islands), and access to private aircraft (noting over 20 international flights since 2018). It also details the danger he poses to the community, citing the recent discovery of lewd photos of minors in his home and a history of witness intimidation, including specific wire transfers made to potential witnesses following negative press coverage in late 2018.
010.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office to Judge Richard Berman requesting an extension of time to respond to Jeffrey Epstein's Bail Motion, citing a lack of financial disclosure from the defense. Judge Berman denied the request via a handwritten note on the document, stating it was 'Hard to imagine it would take the Govt extra time to review submission.'
005.pdf
This is a bail disposition and arraignment form from the U.S. District Court (SDNY) for Jeffrey Epstein, filed on July 8, 2019. It records his arrest on July 6, 2019, his plea of 'Not Guilty' during arraignment, and orders him detained until a detention hearing scheduled for July 11, 2019. He is represented by retained counsel Martin Weinberg, and the government is represented by AUSA Alex Rossmiller.
003.pdf
This document is an Unsealing Order filed on July 8, 2019, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cr-00490). Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry Pitman, the order grants the application made by U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman (via AUSA Alex Rossmiller) to unseal the indictment against defendant Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00029535.pdf
This document contains an email thread between the US Attorney's Office and defense counsel regarding the case USA v. Maxwell on June 30, 2021. The correspondence follows a court order (Docket 305) requiring the parties to submit proposed redactions to the court's opinion on suppression motions. Defense attorney Christian Everdell confirms they have no redactions, and prosecutor Lara Pomerantz agrees to file a joint letter conveying this to the court.
EFTA00026772.pdf
This document is a Protective Order filed on July 25, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. It establishes strict protocols for the handling of discovery materials, distinguishing between 'Confidential Information' (identifying information of witnesses/victims) and 'Highly Confidential Information' (specifically images of nude or partially-nude individuals). The order mandates that the defendant (Epstein) may only review materials in the presence of counsel, cannot possess copies, and prohibits the dissemination of these materials to the public or internet.
EFTA00026750.pdf
This document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government argues for the entry of its proposed protective order regarding discovery materials, specifically opposing the defendant's request to publicly name victims who have previously spoken to the media and opposing restrictions on the Government's use of its own investigative materials. The document includes the full text of the proposed protective order, detailing how 'Confidential' and 'Highly Confidential' information (including sexualized imagery) must be handled by the defense.
EFTA00019667.pdf
A legal stipulation filed on August 20, 2019, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 19-2221-cr). Counsel for Jeffrey Epstein and the United States agreed to dismiss the appeal with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42, with no costs or fees recoverable by either party. This document effectively ends the specific appellate case mentioned, likely following Epstein's death earlier that month (though death is not explicitly cited in the text).
EFTA00010422.pdf
This document is a formal letter and proposed legal order from U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman to Judge Richard M. Berman dated August 19, 2019. It requests the dismissal (nolle prosequi) of the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein following his death by suicide in custody on August 10, 2019, citing the legal rule of abatement. The document also affirms the Government's commitment to continuing support for the victims despite the dismissal of the specific case against Epstein.
EFTA00010410.pdf
This document contains an email chain between defense attorney Christian Everdell and US Attorney's Office prosecutors (Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, et al.) dated June 30, 2021, regarding the case USA v. Maxwell. The correspondence confirms that the defense has no redactions to propose regarding a court opinion and coordinates the filing of a joint letter to the court. The document also includes the official Notice of Electronic Filing (Order 305) from Judge Alison J. Nathan, which set the deadlines for these redaction proposals.
DOJ-OGR-00001756.jpg
This legal document is page 5 of a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 17, 2020. The filing argues that the government has violated the spirit of a Protective Order by its handling of discovery materials, particularly in relation to their potential use in civil litigation and a grand jury investigation. The defense cites previous assurances from the government and a letter from Alex Rossmiller, which the Court relied upon, to argue that a new request should be granted by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00001723.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001711.jpg
This document is an affidavit filed on August 10, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Everdell certifies that the defense counsel has conferred with the prosecution regarding a request to disclose the identities of 'Victims 1-3'. The government denied the immediate request, indicating the identities would be disclosed later as part of the standard discovery process.
DOJ-OGR-00001684.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the second page of a declaration by Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller. It outlines a disagreement between the U.S. Government and the defense regarding proposed restrictions on the public identification of victims and witnesses in the case. The document specifies the conflicting paragraphs in the proposed orders from both sides and references an accompanying letter for the Government's full reasoning.
DOJ-OGR-00001683.jpg
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 28, 2020, in the criminal case of U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Assistant U.S. Attorney Alex Rossmiller affirms that the prosecution and defense have conferred on a proposed protective order but have been unable to resolve two areas of dispute. The first point of contention involves the defense's objection to the government's proposal regarding the referencing of witness and victim identities.
DOJ-OGR-00001663.jpg
This document is a letter filed on July 27, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests time to respond to a defense motion for a protective order, noting that discussions on the matter were ongoing as of the previous evening. At the bottom of the document, Judge Nathan orders a schedule for the response (due July 28) and reply (due July 29), and mandates the parties meet and confer by phone.
DOJ-OGR-00001662.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.
DOJ-OGR-00001660.jpg
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 27, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Everdell certifies that the defense has conferred with federal prosecutors (Moe, Rossmiller, and Comey) regarding a protective order but remains in dispute regarding restrictions on government witnesses' use of discovery materials.
No Subject
The document lists the email address for Alex Rossmiller as Alexander.Rossmiller@usdoj.gov.
No Subject
The document lists the email address for Alex Rossmiller as Alexander.Rossmiller@usdoj.gov.
Opposition to Motion re: Discovery Disclosure
Response in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell.
Protective Order
Government response regarding protective order, objecting to defendant's request to publicly name victims.
Response to Motion by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell regardi...
No preview available
Use of discovery materials in civil litigation
A letter cited as Doc. #33, in which Alex Rossmiller stated that concerns raised by defense counsel about the future use of discovery materials in civil litigation were not likely to occur.
Response to Motion regarding Proposed Protective Order
Response to defense motion regarding protective order.
Response to Motion by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell
Response to Christian R. Everdell's letter motion regarding Proposed Protective Order.
Response to Motion regarding Proposed Protective Order
Response to Christian R. Everdell's motion.
Doc. # 33
Assurances that the Government rarely provides third parties with materials they did not already possess.
Scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling, referenced in Memo Endorsement.
Scheduling
Letter regarding scheduling
Scheduling
Regarding scheduling.
speedy trial time exclusion
A letter motion filed by USA regarding the exclusion of time for a speedy trial for Jeffrey Epstein.
Speedy trial time exclusion
Request for speedy trial time exclusion, granted by judge.
Opposition to Pretrial Release
Letter Response in Opposition by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein regarding Pretrial Release
Opposition to Pretrial Release Motion
A letter response in opposition was filed by Alex Rossmiller on behalf of the USA regarding Reid Weingarten's letter motion for pretrial release.
Response to Motion to Seal
Response to Motion by USA as to Jeffrey Epstein
Response to Motion to Seal Document
A letter response was filed by Alex Rossmiller on behalf of the USA regarding Jeffrey Epstein's motion to seal a document.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity