HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841.jpg
1.3 MB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Transcript (deposition or interview)
File Size:
1.3 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely conducted by the House Oversight Committee. A witness, who is a legal counsel affiliated with the University of Utah College of Law, is being questioned about why a specific footnote—clarifying that their use of the university address did not imply institutional endorsement—was included in one exhibit (Exhibit 1) but omitted from a previous pleading (Exhibit 2). The witness confirms they vouched for the document completely.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Witness (A) | Witness/Counsel |
A legal professional affiliated with the University of Utah College of Law, answering questions about their signature...
|
| Unknown Interviewer (Q) | Interviewer |
Questioning the witness regarding legal ethics and document formatting.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| University of Utah |
Employer/affiliation of the witness.
|
|
| College of Law (Quinney) |
Specific department at the University of Utah where the witness is based.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Cited as the address listed on the legal documents.
|
Relationships (1)
Witness lists their address at the College of Law and discusses institutional endorsement.
Key Quotes (2)
"Yes, I was vouching for this document completely."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841.jpg
Quote #1
"this daytime business address is provided for identification and correspondence purposes only, and is not intended to imply institutional endorsement by the university of Utah"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841.jpg
Quote #2
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document