Unknown Witness
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
[REDACTED]
|
Friend |
10
Very Strong
|
1 | |
|
person
MR. TEIN
|
Legal representative |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Subject of testimony |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US Government/Prosecution
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
USANYS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Inmate count procedure | Correctional Facility | View |
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of a witness by Mr. Tein, indexed to begin on page 4 of the full transcript. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | A deposition is conducted where a witness is questioned by Mr. Tein. | Undetermined | View |
| N/A | N/A | A photograph marked '18-001' is presented to the witness. The witness identifies themselves and a... | During deposition | View |
| N/A | N/A | Process servers served the witness with a subpoena for the deposition. The witness's friend (pict... | Undetermined | View |
| 2021-10-28 | N/A | Government response clarifying that testimony must be in person if required. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-26 | N/A | Witness inquiry regarding summons and possibility of remote testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2020-04-10 | N/A | Date associated with the attached interview file (2020-04-10..._Interview_302.pdf), suggesting an... | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-20 | N/A | Witness pickup and transport to 1SA | 1SA (1 St. Andrew's Plaza) | View |
| 2004-09-29 | N/A | A legal proceeding, likely a deposition, where a direct examination of a witness occurred. The fi... | Likely Coconut Grove, FL | View |
EFTA00038126.pdf
An email dated September 23, 2020, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to a redacted recipient. The sender requests a phone call to discuss a witness associated with an attached FD-302 interview report dated April 10, 2020.
EFTA00032961.pdf
Heavily redacted handwritten notes on legal pad paper labeled 'INMATE 2'. The visible text appears to be from an interview or statement regarding prison procedures, specifically noting that a 'count' was performed 'a little before 12a' (midnight) but not after, and the witness did not hear anyone state they were skipping the count. This likely pertains to the investigation into the monitoring of Jeffrey Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center.
EFTA00031010.pdf
An email dated August 19, 2019, requesting car service to transport a female witness involved in the Epstein death investigation. The witness was scheduled to be picked up the following day and brought to '1SA', likely referring to 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, the location of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.
EFTA00027341.pdf
An internal email dated April 8, 2021, associated with the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The sender instructs a contractor to organize attached emails—specifically noting one regarding 'Epstein' and an 'Updated vic [victim] list'—into a witness folder as 'potential 3500' (Jencks Act) material for a specific female witness whose name is redacted.
EFTA00013608.pdf
An email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney dated September 11, 2007, regarding a hearing about Jeffrey Epstein's computer equipment. The email confirms Judge Marra has scheduled a hearing for the following Tuesday at 9:00 AM, notes that a witness will appear before the grand jury that afternoon, and mentions the prosecutor is contacting attorney Roy Black.
DOJ-OGR-00020899.jpg
This document is a transcript (pages 19-20) from Case 22-1426 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell appeal), dated February 28, 2023. It records the questioning of a witness (likely a juror) regarding their completion of a 'thick' jury questionnaire. The witness admits to 'skimming' and 'flying through' questions based on 'if yes' prompts, stating they were distracted and that the process felt like it took hours.
DOJ-OGR-00010260.jpg
This document is page 45 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on March 11, 2022. It details an inquiry by the Court into a witness or potential juror's interactions with reporters regarding their personal history of sexual abuse. Following the questioning, a sidebar conference occurs where defense attorney Ms. Sternheim requests the Judge ask the individual about their knowledge of the case summary, noting the individual admitted to knowing the case was about sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00010257.jpg
This document is page 42 of a court transcript filed on March 11, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It records a questioning session, likely of a juror (Juror 50), regarding their decision to give press interviews about their status as a sexual abuse victim. The witness explains they did not believe their family or friends would find out because they didn't use their full name and assumed the story wouldn't be major news.
DOJ-OGR-00004695.jpg
This document is a page from a transcript of Grand Jury testimony (labeled MM20-GJ TESTIMONY) filed on May 25, 2021, in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The visible text involves a prosecutor asking a witness (likely an investigator) about independent corroboration of statements made by 'Jane Does' regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they obtained telephone records to corroborate the statement of a specific redacted individual, proving telephonic contact with another redacted party.
DOJ-OGR-00004693.jpg
This document is a page from a confidential grand jury transcript filed on May 25, 2021. A witness is questioned about eight previously discussed victims, specifically regarding whether they had histories of illicit drug use or mental health issues. The witness confirms knowledge of these issues, but the specific details provided in the answer are fully redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00033085.jpg
This document is page 97 of a deposition transcript produced by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about whether she has text messaged FBI agents or federal prosecutors, or if they have shared information with her regarding what 'other girls' have said; she denies both. She also discusses her parents' knowledge of how to contact the FBI, noting that her mother 'doesn't care to know any of this stuff' and mentioning an individual named Paul associated with her mother.
DOJ-OGR-00033084.jpg
This document is page 96 of a deposition transcript recorded by Censor & Associates. Attorney Mr. Tein is questioning a witness about their knowledge of communications between FBI agents, federal prosecutors (specifically Marie Villafona and Jeff Sloman), and other individuals (Mr. Leopold and Mr. Herman). The questioning specifically probes whether the witness knew if Mr. Herman was allowed to review or discuss a 'draft indictment' with federal prosecutors.
DOJ-OGR-00033077.jpg
This is page 89 of a legal deposition transcript processed by Consor & Associates. The witness is questioned about whether they or their parents spoke to any law firms other than those of Mr. Herman and Mr. Leopold. The witness denies speaking to others but asks if 'family court matters.' Ultimately, the witness identifies Mr. Leopold as the person who prepared them for that day's deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033073.jpg
This page is a transcript of a deposition involving a female witness being questioned by Mr. Tein while being defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness testifies that her mother and sister have not spoken to reporters ('zero'), but she cannot speak for her father and stepmother as she does not contact them. The exchange becomes heated when the attorneys argue over the line of questioning, with Mr. Tein telling Mr. Leopold to 'Be quiet' and Mr. Leopold threatening to leave if professional conduct is not maintained.
DOJ-OGR-00033040.jpg
This document is page 52 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about whether they received a victim notification letter (confirmed) and if they provided physical evidence to law enforcement. The witness denies providing physical evidence initially, but then clarifies they gave their cell phone to a woman named Michelle Pagan approximately three or four years prior to the deposition.
DOJ-OGR-00033031.jpg
This document is page 43 of a legal deposition transcript (Page 2718 of the larger record). An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a conversation with a woman named Hayley regarding earning money by visiting 'Epstein's house' every weekend. The witness denies making the comment, attributing it to Hayley instead. The testimony also covers the group leaving Epstein's house with money and going to a Marshall's store, with the witness denying they spent the money personally.
DOJ-OGR-00017600.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the prosecution (Ms. Moe), the defense (Ms. Menninger), and the Court regarding the need to protect the privacy of a crime victim during upcoming cross-examination. The Court instructs the parties to 'meet and confer' to resolve issues regarding anonymizing names and identifying topics.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021949.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft of a legal transcript, likely a deposition involving House Oversight. A witness is questioned about their knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with academics in Florida and New York, and specifically whether they knew Epstein had an office at Harvard (which the witness denies). The page concludes with an attorney, Mr. Scarola, interrupting to note that the session must end at 4:30 PM per a prior agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021856.jpg
This document page is a rough draft of a deposition transcript. A witness is questioned by Mr. Simpson about whether anyone had told them that Professor Dershowitz abused minors. Ms. McCawley objects based on attorney/client privilege regarding Virginia Roberts, and Mr. Scarola instructs the witness not to answer, to which the witness agrees.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021855.jpg
This document is page 32 of a rough draft deposition transcript (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021855). A witness testifies that they understood the term "massage" at Jeffrey Epstein's residence to be a code word for sexual abuse or activity, often involving underage girls as young as 13 or 14. The questioning focuses on whether the witness had sufficient legal basis on December 30, 2014, to allege that anyone receiving a massage there had abused minors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021849.jpg
This document is page 26 of a rough draft deposition transcript from a House Oversight investigation. The testimony clarifies that a specific police report documents 'forcible rape of underage girls' and roughly 180 sexual encounters by Jeffrey Epstein over a six-month period at a mansion. The witness confirms the report does not accuse Alan Dershowitz of abuse, but characterizes Epstein as one of Dershowitz's 'closest friends.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021841.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition or interview, likely conducted by the House Oversight Committee. A witness, who is a legal counsel affiliated with the University of Utah College of Law, is being questioned about why a specific footnote—clarifying that their use of the university address did not imply institutional endorsement—was included in one exhibit (Exhibit 1) but omitted from a previous pleading (Exhibit 2). The witness confirms they vouched for the document completely.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021833.jpg
Page 10 of a deposition transcript marked 'ROUGH DRAFT ONLY' bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. The dialogue involves an interviewer questioning a witness about the ethical responsibilities of an attorney when signing pleadings filed in Federal Court, specifically the Southern District of Florida. The witness defines the obligation as ensuring a good-faith pleading based on facts and law while zealously representing the client.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021831.jpg
This is page 8 of a rough draft deposition transcript. The text begins with a procedural discussion between a questioner and a witness regarding how questions should be answered. Mr. Scarola interrupts to ask about a document placed before him, which Mr. Scott confirms is a copy of an entry from Professor Dershowitz's book, provided in response to a request made during a previous deposition.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443.jpg
This document is a two-page excerpt from a deposition transcript, identified by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012443'. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about a photograph (marked 18-001) showing the witness and a redacted friend, connecting the friend's presence to the day the witness was served a subpoena. The transcript also records a tense procedural discussion between the attorneys, Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger, regarding the marking of evidence.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-23 | Received | FBI | Unknown Witness | $0.00 | Reimbursement of trial witness related expenses... | View |
Nadia Marcinkova's involvement
Allegations that Marcinkova served as a willing accomplice in sexual assaults.
Discussion of Police Report content regarding Epstein and...
Witness confirms the report does not accuse Dershowitz of abuse, but details extensive abuse by Epstein (180 encounters in 6 months).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity