HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
2.57 MB
Extraction Summary
3
People
5
Organizations
5
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document / congressional oversight record
File Size:
2.57 MB
Summary
This document page features an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the evolution of sexual assault laws, contrasting historical common law restrictions with modern reforms like rape shield laws. It also contains footnotes detailing state prosecutorial structures and citing legal precedents regarding prosecutorial discretion and equal protection.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | ||
| Steven W. Perry | ||
| Kenneth Culp Davis |
Organizations (5)
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (2)
→
→
to
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"The affirmative power to prosecute is enormous, but the negative power to withhold prosecution may be even greater, because it is less protected against abuse..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
Quote #1
"Unlike the common law definition, rape convictions required proof that the offender used force to overcome the victim's 'utmost resistance.'"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
Quote #2
"Prosecutors and police were openly skeptical of rape accusations and reluctant to investigate."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document