Minnesota Law Review
OrganizationRelationship Network
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016551.jpg
This document is the final page (42 of 42) of a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article discussing the legal theory of 'underenforcement,' particularly regarding sexual assault crimes and police violence. It compares U.S. federal oversight and local prosecution to systems in England and Canada. The text concludes that current safeguards are insufficient for marginalized victim groups. The document contains the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' at the bottom and bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, suggesting it was included as an exhibit in a congressional inquiry, likely related to Schoen's representation of high-profile clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016550.jpg
This document is page 41 of a 42-page legal text, specifically from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), containing footnotes 226 through 238. The text references various legal studies, statutes, and articles concerning prosecutorial discretion, domestic violence laws, political influence on sentencing, and the independence of prosecutors in the US and abroad (Australia, Ireland, Canada). The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016546.jpg
This document is page 37 of a legal filing submitted to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (indicated by the footer). The content is an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) containing footnotes 178-187, which discuss the history of sexual assault legislation, the backlog of untested rape kits, the evolution of 'rape shield' laws, and the efficacy of specialized prosecution units for sexual crimes and prison abuse. While the text discusses general legal precedents and statistics regarding sexual assault, its submission by Schoen suggests relevance to a specific investigation, likely regarding the handling of sexual abuse cases.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016545.jpg
This document is page 36 of 42 from a legal filing or research file belonging to David Schoen (attorney), specifically an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 844). The text consists of footnotes (163-177) discussing federal jurisdiction (Travel Act, honest services fraud), discrepancies in sexual assault reporting statistics between the FBI and CDC, and criticism of law enforcement clearance rates for sexual crimes, including specific references to the LAPD and LA Sheriff's Department. The document appears to be part of a larger collection produced to the House Oversight Committee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016544.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), specifically the conclusion of an article discussing prosecutorial discretion, victim rights, and federalism/state jurisdiction. It appears to be an exhibit submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely to support legal arguments regarding the handling of the Epstein case, specifically concerning the non-prosecution agreement or federal/state jurisdiction issues. The text analyzes the differences between U.S. and foreign legal systems regarding the ability of victims to challenge decisions not to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016542.jpg
A page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The document contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the politics of prosecutorial discretion, specifically regarding underenforcement in cases of domestic violence and sexual assault. It also includes footnotes citing various federal statutes related to sex trafficking of minors (18 U.S.C. § 1591), public corruption, and bribery.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016540.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103, p. 904) submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text discusses the legal theory of 'federal redundancy' and the 'dual sovereignty' doctrine (citing Gamble v. United States), arguing that federal prosecutors serve as a check on local prosecutors in cases of police misconduct. While the text focuses on police violence and double jeopardy laws, its inclusion in this production is likely relevant to legal arguments surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement and whether federal charges could supersede state agreements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016539.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol 103) discussing the complexities of federal versus state jurisdiction in cases of police violence and 'excessive use of force.' It analyzes the high 'mens rea' standard required for federal prosecution and compares the US system to those of Germany, Canada, and Australia. The document bears the name of David Schoen (an attorney for Jeffrey Epstein) and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of a congressional inquiry, possibly related to arguments about federal jurisdiction or deaths in custody.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016537.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) discussing the systemic underenforcement of sexual assault laws in the United States and the failure of state criminal justice systems to adequately address the issue. It includes extensive footnotes citing legal precedents and state statutes regarding prosecutorial discretion and victim rights. The document was produced by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, as indicated by the footer and Bates stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016536.jpg
This document page features an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the evolution of sexual assault laws, contrasting historical common law restrictions with modern reforms like rape shield laws. It also contains footnotes detailing state prosecutorial structures and citing legal precedents regarding prosecutorial discretion and equal protection.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016535.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol. 103) submitted by David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee. The text analyzes the lack of federal jurisdiction overlap in sexual assault cases compared to public corruption, noting that federal law usually only applies in specific instances like human trafficking or crimes on federal property. The footnotes extensively cite the Crime Victims' Rights Act (18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)) and various state constitutions regarding a victim's right to confer with the prosecution, a legal issue relevant to the handling of the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016532.jpg
This page from the Minnesota Law Review discusses the pros and cons of federalism-based enforcement redundancy in criminal law, specifically comparing it to private prosecution and administrative review. It argues that while federalism offers a check on state underenforcement, it relies heavily on the discretion of federal prosecutors rather than private victims. The text is heavily footnoted with references to UK and Canadian case law regarding prosecutorial oversight.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) discussing federalism, prosecutorial discretion, and the expansion of federal law enforcement (including the FBI) to address local corruption and bias. The footnotes provide a comparative legal analysis, citing German laws (StPO) regarding the mandatory duty to prosecute crimes, contrasting it with discretionary powers. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016531' and bears the name 'DAVID SCHOEN' (Jeffrey Epstein's attorney), suggesting it was part of a legal file or submission regarding arguments about prosecutorial oversight or misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) produced by attorney David Schoen for the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016529). The text discusses the legal theory of 'Federalism Safeguards on Prosecutorial Discretion,' specifically analyzing how the U.S. system allows federal prosecutors to override or 'second-guess' state prosecutors' decisions not to prosecute (declination decisions), contrasting this with models in Canada, Germany, and Australia. The footnotes discuss historical racial inequities in the U.S. justice system and EU directives on crime victims' rights.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016528.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It contains an excerpt from the Minnesota Law Review discussing 'Declination Oversight,' comparing U.S. and European approaches to prosecutorial discretion and private prosecution. The page includes extensive footnotes citing various state laws (RI, NH, NC, OK, PA) and legal scholarship regarding grand juries and selective prosecution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016527.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing the oversight of declination decisions in state justice systems compared to the federal system. It highlights the lack of administrative and judicial review for state prosecutors' charging decisions and details the limited exceptions and historical context through extensive footnotes citing case law.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016524.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103), submitted as an exhibit to the House Oversight Committee by attorney David Schoen (associated with Jeffrey Epstein). The text discusses legal theories regarding the judicial and administrative review of decisions *not* to charge (prosecutorial discretion), contrasting the lack of such mechanisms in the U.S. with their prevalence in the E.U. and England. This legal argument is relevant to the controversy surrounding the non-prosecution agreement in the Epstein case and the rights of his victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol. 103, circa 2019) discussing the legal theory and international differences regarding private prosecutions versus public prosecutors. It specifically highlights the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the footnotes. The document appears to be from the files of David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer), as indicated by the footer, and was submitted to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016520.jpg
This page is an extract from a legal brief or filing submitted by attorney David Schoen to the House Oversight Committee (likely related to the Epstein investigation). It cites a Minnesota Law Review article discussing the limitations of victims' rights in the U.S. compared to other jurisdictions, specifically noting that U.S. victims generally lack the power to challenge prosecutorial discretion (decisions not to prosecute). The document includes extensive footnotes citing various examples of enforcement discretion and budget limitations in contexts like tax law and marijuana enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
This document is a page from a legal academic article (Minnesota Law Review) discussing the concept of 'underenforcement' in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding sexual assaults and corruption. It argues that underenforcement often stems from bias or favoritism and undermines the legitimacy of legal institutions. The document bears the name of David Schoen (one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely to argue points regarding prosecutorial discretion or failure to prosecute.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016514.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review discussing the complexities of criminal prosecution jurisdiction between state and federal levels, particularly regarding police misconduct and sexual assault. It argues that federal oversight is an imperfect backstop due to higher legal standards and political shifts, and highlights the lack of safeguards against unjustified decisions not to prosecute compared to the robust protections against improper charging. The text includes extensive footnotes citing legal cases, statutes, and articles related to police violence and civil rights enforcement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512.jpg
This document is a page from the Minnesota Law Review (Vol 103) submitted as an exhibit, marked with the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016512 and the name David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer). The text is an academic legal analysis discussing 'enforcement redundancy,' 'underenforcement,' and the interplay between federal and state jurisdiction, as well as the Department of Justice's internal review processes. It appears to be part of a legal argument regarding prosecutorial discretion or jurisdiction, likely relevant to the double jeopardy or dual sovereignty issues in the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510.jpg
This document is a page from a 2018 Minnesota Law Review article by Darryl K. Brown titled 'Criminal Enforcement Redundancy: Oversight of Decisions Not to Prosecute.' The text discusses the legal theory behind underenforcement of criminal law, specifically citing failures to prosecute sexual assaults and racially motivated crimes. While the text does not mention Epstein, the document bears the footer 'DAVID SCHOEN' (an attorney associated with Epstein) and a Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016510', indicating it was part of an evidentiary production to the House Oversight Committee, likely as legal research regarding the controversial non-prosecution agreement Epstein received.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016548.jpg
This document is a page of footnotes from the Minnesota Law Review, citing various legal cases, statutes, and news reports regarding police misconduct, officer-involved shootings, and criminal justice policies. It references specific incidents like the shootings of Philando Castile and Walter Scott, as well as legislative acts like the Death in Custody Reporting Act.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis search log generated by attorney David Schoen on February 28, 2019. It details a search for legal secondary materials (law reviews) using the terms 'cvra' (Crime Victims' Rights Act) and 'sixth amendment,' specifically locating an article in the Minnesota Law Review concerning the oversight of decisions not to prosecute. The document is stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016509.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity