EFTA00029728.pdf

54.1 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 54.1 KB
Summary

An email exchange between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Michael Miller, Reid Weingarten) occurring in late August 2019, shortly after Epstein's death. The correspondence concerns the logistical wrap-up of the criminal case, specifically the 'expected nolle order' (dismissal), the return or certified destruction of discovery materials, and a follow-up on civil forfeiture.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Martin G. Weinberg Defense Attorney
Addressed as 'Marty', recipient of the emails; CC'd in header.
Michael Miller Defense Attorney
CC'd in header; referred to as 'Mike' in body regarding a conference call.
Reid Weingarten Defense Attorney
CC'd in header.
Redacted Sender (Aug 25) Government Official/Prosecutor
Asking about defense's intention to address the Court and return of discovery.
Redacted Sender (Aug 22) Assistant U.S. Attorney
Sender of the previous email regarding civil forfeiture and discovery destruction; identified by signature.
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Mentioned in subject line 'U.S. v. Epstein'.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District of New York
Jurisdiction listed in the signature block of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
U.S. Attorney's Office
Implied by 'Assistant U.S. Attorney' title.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-08-27
Court Hearing
Court (implied SDNY)
Defense Team Government Prosecutors

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the U.S. Attorney's office involved.

Relationships (2)

Martin G. Weinberg Colleagues/Co-counsel Michael Miller
Referenced together for a conference call ('give you (or Mike, to conference you in) a call').
Martin G. Weinberg Opposing Counsel Assistant U.S. Attorney
Correspondence regarding case dismissal and discovery obligations.

Key Quotes (4)

"whether the defense intends to address the Court beyond noting that there is no objection to the dismissal?"
Source
EFTA00029728.pdf
Quote #1
"certify that all discovery received has been security destroyed or deleted"
Source
EFTA00029728.pdf
Quote #2
"based on the expected nolle order"
Source
EFTA00029728.pdf
Quote #3
"We want to be able to advise the Court on Tuesday that there are no outstanding discovery obligations"
Source
EFTA00029728.pdf
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document