Martin G. Weinberg
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Client |
29
Very Strong
|
36 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Corresponded |
8
Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Corresponded |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
David Pegg
|
Correspondent |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Richard M. Berman
|
Judicial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert D. Balin
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
ICI
|
Professional licensing |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Marc Allan Fernich
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Co counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Michael Miller
|
Co counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Assistant U.S. Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Represented by |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted AUSA]
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
REID WEINGARTEN
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
CIA
|
Professional |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's lawyers sign a letter disputing a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Letter signed by Epstein's legal team responding to a Times editorial. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Signing of a letter by Epstein's legal team refuting sex trafficking offenses | Unknown | View |
| 2021-11-01 | N/A | Court Conference | Court | View |
| 2021-03-24 | N/A | Issuance of Certificate of Good Standing. | Washington, D.C. | View |
| 2019-08-27 | N/A | Court hearing to consider the government's motion to dismiss the indictment against Jeffrey Epstein. | New York, N.Y. | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Telephone conversation regarding the status of the estate. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Martin Weinberg requests access to MCC video footage from USANYS. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled conference call regarding 'potential civil forfeiture issues' and investigation contacts. | Teleconference (Dial-in pro... | View |
| 2019-08-15 | N/A | Scheduled call regarding potential civil forfeiture issues in US v Epstein case. | Conference Call (Dial-in re... | View |
| 2019-08-12 | N/A | Email inquiry regarding dismissal of indictment | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Preservation Request Submission | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-11 | N/A | Request for preservation of evidence sent by family attorney | Boston/New York | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Conversations between the sender and Mike Miller/Marty Weinberg regarding the situation. | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Communication regarding the death of Jeffrey Epstein, the release of a BOP press release, and the... | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-05 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance for Substitute, Additional, or Amicus Counsel | Court (Docket No. 19-2221) | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Martin Weinberg sent a document/attachment to a recipient who was out of office. | N/A | View |
| 2019-08-01 | N/A | Follow-up letter received seeking preservation of records. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Court conference regarding scheduling, discovery, and trial date. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Conference (Court Hearing) in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19 Cr. 490 (RMB)) to ... | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2019-07-31 | Court conference | A court conference was held in the case of United States of America v. Jeffrey Epstein. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2019-07-30 | N/A | Anticipated deadline for initial discovery production mentioned by the government ('no later than... | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-29 | N/A | Renewal of admission to practice in the Court by Martin G. Weinberg | Court | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Formal preservation/production request made regarding NPA-related materials. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-26 | N/A | Submission of formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials in US v Epstein case. | N/A | View |
055.pdf
A letter from Fordham Law Professor Bruce A. Green to Judge Richard Berman clarifying the record regarding a previous court hearing. Green asserts that contrary to comments made in court, he has never served as legal counsel for Jeffrey Epstein or his estate, although he did serve as an expert witness for Alan Dershowitz in a separate defamation case (Giuffre v. Dershowitz).
042.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 31, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings focused on setting a schedule for discovery, motion practice (specifically regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement), and a trial date. The government proposed a June 2020 trial, while the defense requested September 2020 due to the volume of discovery (over a million pages) and the complexity of the case; Judge Berman tentatively set the trial for June 8, 2020.
036.pdf
This document is a transcript of a bail hearing for Jeffrey Epstein held on July 15, 2019, in the SDNY. The government argued for detention based on flight risk (citing wealth, foreign ties, and a fake passport found in a safe) and danger to the community, while the defense argued for release on house arrest, citing his 14-year record of appearing for court and lack of recent convictions. Two victims, Annie Farmer and Courtney Wild, spoke in court opposing bail.
025.pdf
This document is a cover letter filed on July 17, 2019, by attorney Reid Weingarten of Steptoe & Johnson LLP to Judge Richard M. Berman regarding the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. The letter submits attached documents concerning Epstein's New Mexico registration status to support his bail application, following up on a previous letter dated July 16, 2019. The filing also lists Martin G. Weinberg and Marc Allan Fernich as additional counsel.
020.pdf
Transcript of the initial appearance and arraignment of Jeffrey Epstein on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. The government argues for pretrial detention, citing extreme flight risk due to wealth/private jets and danger to the community based on evidence found in his home (photos of minors) and potential witness tampering. The defense pleads not guilty, argues the conduct is 'ancient' (2002-2005), and claims a 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement covers the conduct; a full detention hearing is scheduled for July 11.
018.pdf
This document is a transcript of a court conference held on July 8, 2019, in the Southern District of New York regarding the case U.S. v. Jeffrey Epstein. The proceedings cover the scheduling of bail hearings, the government's confirmation of its obligation to notify victims, and preliminary arguments regarding the 2007/2008 Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The defense argues the NPA bars this prosecution, while the government asserts the NPA does not bind the Southern District of New York and that the current indictment involves separate conduct and victims.
017.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 16, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to be admitted Pro Hac Vice to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, Massachusetts.
013-03.pdf
This document is an affidavit dated July 15, 2019, filed by attorney Martin G. Weinberg in the case United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (19-CR-490). Weinberg affirms his clean legal record (no felonies, censures, or pending disciplinary proceedings) in support of a motion to be admitted pro hac vice to represent Epstein in the Southern District of New York.
013-02.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York filed on July 15, 2019, in the case of USA v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Richard M. Berman grants the motion for attorney Martin G. Weinberg to appear Pro Hac Vice as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein. The document lists Weinberg's contact information in Boston, MA.
012-02.pdf
This document is a court order filed on July 15, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, granting attorney Martin G. Weinberg's motion to be admitted Pro Hac Vice. This admission allows Weinberg, a Massachusetts-based attorney, to serve as co-counsel for the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein, in criminal case No. 19 Cr 490 under Judge Richard M. Berman.
012-01.pdf
A Certificate of Good Standing issued by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts for attorney Martin G. Weinberg. It certifies that he was admitted to the bar on April 24, 1972, and remains in good standing as of July 11, 2019. The document was filed as an exhibit (Document 12-1) in the federal criminal case against Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB) on July 15, 2019, likely to support a pro hac vice application.
007.pdf
This document is a motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich) requesting the court's permission to file a supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that due to the high profile nature of the case and the Bail Reform Act (18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1)), the financial details should remain confidential to prevent them from being disseminated by the news media. The document emphasizes that the financial disclosure is intended solely for bail determination purposes.
006.pdf
This document is a letter from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel to Judge Richard Berman arguing for pretrial release on bail. The defense proposes strict conditions including home detention, GPS monitoring, and a substantial bond secured by Epstein's $77 million Manhattan home and private jet, with his brother and friend as co-sureties. The letter argues Epstein is not a flight risk (citing his U.S. ties and surrender of passport) and that the current charges are barred by a 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement.
EFTA00036030.pdf
This document contains an email chain initiating from an MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The primary content is a formal legal request from Epstein's attorney, Martin G. Weinberg, sent on August 11, 2019 (the day after Epstein's death), demanding the preservation of all evidence including video logs, physical evidence (ligatures, notes), and staff logs related to Epstein's death on August 10 and a prior suicide attempt on July 23. The chain also includes the initial notification of death sent by the MCC to Weinberg on August 10.
EFTA00033663.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the MCC Supervisory Staff Attorney and Martin G. Weinberg, the attorney for Jeffrey Epstein's family. The primary content is an August 11, 2019, request from Weinberg to the MCC demanding the preservation of all evidence (videos, logs, notes, medical records, etc.) related to Epstein's detention, attempted suicide on July 23, and death on August 10. The chain also includes the initial August 10 notification from the MCC to Weinberg confirming Epstein's death.
EFTA00032389.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-21, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death, between Michael Miller (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) and the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The SDNY informs Miller that due to Epstein's death and the impending dismissal (nolle prosequi) of the criminal case, no further evidence productions will be made. Miller discusses serving requests for information ('Touhy requests') on the MCC and FBI.
EFTA00031718.pdf
This document is an automatic email notification from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit, dated August 21, 2019. It confirms the filing of a 'FRAP 42 STIPULATION, with prejudice' in the case of United States of America v. Epstein (Case No. 19-2221), which typically indicates a voluntary dismissal of an appeal (likely following Epstein's death earlier that month). The notice lists attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten as recipients, along with several redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
EFTA00031717.pdf
This document is an automated email notification from the Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit, dated August 21, 2019. It confirms the filing of a 'FRAP 42 STIPULATION, with prejudice' in the case of United States of America v. Epstein (Case No. 19-2221). The notice lists attorneys Martin G. Weinberg and Reid Weingarten as recipients, along with several redacted Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
EFTA00030518.pdf
An email chain from July 25, 2019, involving defense attorney Martin G. Weinberg and others regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Weinberg confirms his intent to sign a Protective Order on behalf of the defense team and requests information on the timing and format of the first wave of discovery. Subsequent emails discuss internal coordination with individuals named Maurene and Andy to prepare materials before an upcoming conference.
EFTA00030260.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys (Martin Weinberg and Reid Weingarten) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence concerns the government's bail memorandum and discovery materials, specifically referencing records obtained from 'Institution 1.' The defense requests these records be provided as discovery rather than public filing, and the prosecution confirms they will be produced under Rule 16.
EFTA00030161.pdf
This document contains an email chain between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Martin Weinberg, and government prosecutors (names redacted) from July 6-7, 2019. The correspondence coordinates the logistics for unsealing the indictment against Epstein, his upcoming court presentation at 500 Pearl Street, and discussions regarding bail arguments and search warrant inventories. Weinberg also mentions being with attorney Reid Weingarten.
EFTA00029734.pdf
This document is an email thread from August 2019, shortly before Jeffrey Epstein's death, regarding the case 'US v Epstein'. Attorney Martin G. Weinberg writes to a redacted party requesting a response to letters seeking the preservation of records, specifically mentioning Assistant US Attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia. The redacted respondent replies on August 9, 2019, stating a comprehensive response will be sent shortly.
EFTA00029728.pdf
An email exchange between the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Michael Miller, Reid Weingarten) occurring in late August 2019, shortly after Epstein's death. The correspondence concerns the logistical wrap-up of the criminal case, specifically the 'expected nolle order' (dismissal), the return or certified destruction of discovery materials, and a follow-up on civil forfeiture.
EFTA00028985.pdf
This document is a legal motion filed on July 11, 2019, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorneys requesting permission to file his supplemental financial disclosure under seal. The defense argues that under the Bail Reform Act, such financial information should remain confidential to prevent widespread media dissemination given the high-profile nature of the case. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Reid Weingarten, Martin G. Weinberg, and Marc Allan Fernich.
EFTA00028442.pdf
This document is an email dated August 2, 2019, from attorney Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP regarding 'U.S. v. Epstein'. The email attaches a discovery letter and is copied to several other individuals, including attorneys Reid Weingarten and Martin G. Weinberg. The primary recipients' names are redacted.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010-04-16 | Paid | Martin G. Weinberg | FBI | $1,000.00 | Preauthorization for spending on FOIA search/pr... | View |
Request for intervention regarding FBI FOIA production delay
Requesting intervention to expedite production of a 12,000 page file and requesting a conference regarding FBI's FOIA responsibilities.
Follow-up on civil forfeiture
Voicemail left in the morning regarding civil forfeiture.
RE: Confidential - Epstein
Denial of request to share information/video footage; request for any useful information for ongoing investigation.
US v Epstein
Informing recipient that a Petition to Probate the Epstein Estate and Will was filed in the Virgin Islands the previous day.
Confidential - Epstein
Request from Epstein's prior defense attorneys to view video footage of his jail cell and hallway at MCC from midnight to 7 AM on Aug 10, 2019.
Re: US v Epstein
Inquiry about availability at 9:30 AM tomorrow to discuss potential civil forfeiture issues.
Re: US v Epstein
Confirming time works and asking for a dial-in.
Re: US v Epstein
Requesting availability for a call at 9:30 tomorrow to discuss 'potential civil forfeiture issues'. States he and Mike are authorized to continue discussion.
Re: US v Epstein
Confirmation that the time works and request for a dial-in number.
Re: US v Epstein
Initial inquiry: 'Alex, Mike and I are authorized to continue the discussion of potential civil forfeiture issues with you. Are you available at 930 tomorrow morning?'
US v Epstein
Requesting taint team for seized Virgin Islands computers; asking about dismissal of charges (nolle prosequi); requesting call with death investigators.
US v Epstein
Requesting confirmation of preservation requests, requesting DNA testing on ligatures/bed stripping found in MCC cell, requesting taint review for seized emails, and inquiring about dismissal of indictment.
RE: US v Epstein
Formal request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and previous suicide attempt on behalf of his family.
RE: United States v. Jeffrey Epstein
Detailed request for preservation of all evidence regarding Epstein's death and July 23 incident.
US v Epstein
Weinberg asks for response to letters from July 26 and Aug 1 seeking preservation/production. Specifically requests advising AUSAs in ND Ga and others to preserve records pending discovery requests due Sept 13.
United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr. 490 (RMB)
Response denying broad discovery requests while affirming obligations under Rule 16 and Brady.
Notice of Appearance
Formal notice that Martin G. Weinberg is joining as additional counsel for Jeffrey Epstein.
US v Epstein
Resending an attachment regarding US v Epstein because the original recipient was out of office.
RE: US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email and requesting that 'all three of us' be included on future emails regarding the case.
US v Epstein
Sending a more formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
US v Epstein
Acknowledging receipt of email regarding preservation/production; promising a responsive letter by Monday; asking for timing and format of discovery so Steptoe IT can prepare.
US v Epstein
Sending a formal preservation/production request for NPA-related materials.
RE: US v Epstein
Weinberg requests the prosecution break out search warrants, affidavits, and returns from the main discovery production and email them to him and Reid Weingarten immediately.
RE: US v Epstein
Confirming initial discovery production will happen no later than Tuesday in native electronic format (PDFs, JPEGs).
US v Epstein
Stating intent to sign the Protective Order on behalf of the Epstein defense team and inquiring about the first wave of discovery.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity