HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
1.79 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (opposition to motion for summary judgment)
File Size:
1.79 MB
Summary
This legal document is page 5 of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It details that Epstein settled three cases on July 6, 2010, following court-ordered mediation, with confidential terms. The text argues against Epstein's claims that he was a victim of a scheme involving Edwards and Rothstein (RRA), noting Edwards had severed ties with Rothstein prior to the settlements, and highlights a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts as significant evidence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant/Plaintiff in countersuit |
Paid settlements in July 2010; filed lawsuit against Edwards alleging abuse of process.
|
| Edwards | Attorney/Defendant |
Bradley Edwards; filed Opposition to Epstein's Motion; accused by Epstein of abuse of process.
|
| Rothstein | Associate/Figure in Ponzi Scheme |
Associated with RRA; ran a Ponzi scheme; Edwards severed ties with him in Dec 2009.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Witness/Victim |
Her telephone interview was submitted as evidence in support of Edwards' Motion for Punitive Damages.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| RRA |
Law firm (Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler) that Edwards left in December 2009.
|
|
| Federal Court |
Ordered the mediation process resulting in settlements.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Relationships (3)
Edwards filed cases against Epstein; Epstein filed lawsuit against Edwards.
Edwards left RRA and severed connection in December 2009.
Interview submitted in support of Edwards' motion.
Key Quotes (5)
"On July 6, 2010 Epstein ultimately paid to settle all three of the cases Edwards had filed against him"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
Quote #1
"At Epstein’s request, the terms of the settlement were kept confidential."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
Quote #2
"Epstein could not have been the victim of any scheme to pump the cases against him because he never paid to settle the cases until well after Edwards had left RRA"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
Quote #3
"Epstein could not have suffered any damage as a result of the perpetration of the Ponzi scheme by Rothstein because he was not an investor in the scheme."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
Quote #4
"Perhaps the most significant evidence presented ... is the telephone interview of Virginia Roberts submitted in Support of Edwards’ Motion for Punitive Damages"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013308.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document