DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg

902 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

1
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 902 KB
Summary

This legal document, page 3 of 29 from a court filing, discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct. It emphasizes that a lawyer's duty to take remedial action, such as disclosing fraudulent conduct to a court, is triggered only by "actual knowledge," a subjective standard. The document cites the 1988 Second Circuit case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee' to support the argument that a mere belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to compel disclosure.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Doe Party in a legal case
Mentioned in the case name 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee'.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Second Circuit Court
Cited as a leading case authority on the knowledge requirement for lawyers.
Federal Grievance Committee Government agency
A party in the case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee'.
American Bar Association (ABA) Professional association
Mentioned in a footnote regarding the ABA Model Rules.
Department of Justice (DOJ) Government agency
Appears in the document control number 'DOJ-OGR-00009449' at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

1988
The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), addressed the knowledge requirement for a lawyer to report a belief that an opposing witness had lied.
Connecticut
Doe Federal Grievance Committee district judge lawyer

Locations (2)

Location Context
A district judge in Connecticut disciplined a lawyer in the cited case.
The document discusses New York Rules of Professional Conduct (Rule 3.5(d), Rule 1.0(k), Rule 8.4(d)).

Relationships (2)

Lawyer Professional Client
The document outlines a lawyer's duties regarding evidence offered by a client and the client's position in a legal matter.
Lawyer Professional Tribunal/Court
The document details a lawyer's obligation to disclose false evidence, adverse legal authority, and improper conduct to the court.

Key Quotes (3)

"Knowingly, know, or knows denotes actual knowledge of the fact in question. A person’s knowledge may be inferred from circumstances."
Source
— New York Rule 1.0(k) (Defining the standard of knowledge required for a lawyer's ethical obligations.)
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
Quote #1
"A lawyer shall reveal promptly to the court improper conduct by a member of the venire or a juror, or by another toward a member of the venire or a juror or a member of his or her family of which the lawyer has knowledge."
Source
— New York Rule 3.5(d) (Stating a lawyer's duty to report improper conduct related to jurors.)
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
Quote #2
"a “lawyer or law firm shall not...engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice.”"
Source
— New York Rule 8.4(d) (Quoted in a footnote discussing whether this general rule expands the specific knowledge requirement of other rules.)
DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document