Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Federal Grievance Committee

Organization
Mentions
4
Relationships
0
Events
2
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
No relationships found for this entity.
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
1988-01-01 Legal case The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), address... Connecticut View
1988-01-01 Legal case The case of Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988) was decided, in which... Connecticut View

DOJ-OGR-00010128.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing from April 6, 2012, in case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP. It discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct, specifically concerning the duty to act upon knowledge of false evidence, fraudulent conduct, or improper conduct toward a jury. The document emphasizes that the standard for a lawyer's required knowledge is "actual knowledge" and cites the 1988 Second Circuit case, *Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee*, to illustrate this legal principle.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009449.jpg

This legal document, page 3 of 29 from a court filing, discusses a lawyer's ethical obligations under various New York Rules of Professional Conduct. It emphasizes that a lawyer's duty to take remedial action, such as disclosing fraudulent conduct to a court, is triggered only by "actual knowledge," a subjective standard. The document cites the 1988 Second Circuit case 'Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee' to support the argument that a mere belief of wrongdoing is insufficient to compel disclosure.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search