HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017870.jpg
Extraction Summary
Document Information
This document is page 805 from a legal reporter (349 F.Supp.2d 765), specifically regarding 'In Re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001' in the S.D.N.Y. It outlines the legal standards for establishing personal jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants based on a 'conspiracy theory' under New York law (C.P.L.R. § 302(a)(2)). The text cites numerous precedents to explain that plaintiffs must prove a corrupt agreement, an overt act, intentional participation, and resulting damage to link a defendant to a conspiracy committed in New York. The document appears to be part of a production to the House Oversight Committee, likely included in an investigation file to establish legal precedent for jurisdiction over entities involved in complex conspiracies, though Jeffrey Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.
People (12)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Birenbaum | Party in cited case law |
Cited in Lehigh Valley Indus. Inc. v. Birenbaum
|
| Lamarr | Plaintiff in cited case law |
Cited in Lamarr v. Klein
|
| Klein | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in Lamarr v. Klein
|
| Singer | Plaintiff in cited case law |
Cited in Singer v. Bell
|
| Bell | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in Singer v. Bell
|
| Kashi | Plaintiff in cited case law |
Cited in Kashi v. Gratsos
|
| Gratsos | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in Kashi v. Gratsos
|
| Dixon | Plaintiff in cited case law |
Cited in Dixon v. Mack
|
| Mack | Defendant in cited case law |
Cited in Dixon v. Mack
|
| Mario Valente | Plaintiff party in cited case law |
Cited in Mario Valente Collezioni Ltd. v. Confezioni Semeraro Paolo
|
| Semeraro Paolo | Defendant party in cited case law |
Cited in Mario Valente Collezioni Ltd. v. Confezioni Semeraro Paolo
|
| al Qaeda terrorists | Alleged Co-conspirators |
Mentioned in section [42] as conspiring with Defendants to perpetrate 9/11 attacks
|
Organizations (9)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court (S.D.N.Y.) |
Issuing court for the opinion
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Indicated by footer stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT
|
|
| Chrysler Capital Corp. |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Century Power Corp. |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Lehigh Valley Indus., Inc. |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Daventree Ltd. |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Republic of Azerbaijan |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Mario Valente Collezioni Ltd. |
Cited case precedent
|
|
| Confezioni Semeraro Paolo, S.R.L. |
Cited case precedent
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (1)
Key Quotes (3)
"Plaintiffs claim that all Defendants in these actions conspired with the al Qaeda terrorists to perpetrate the attacks of September 11."Source
"To establish personal jurisdiction on a conspiracy theory, Plaintiffs must make a prima facie showing of conspiracy, allege specific facts warranting the inference that the defendant was a member of the conspiracy, and show that the defendant’s co-conspirator committed a tort in New York."Source
"the bland assertion of conspiracy ... is insufficient to establish jurisdiction"Source
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document