DOJ-OGR-00009729.jpg

683 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

10
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 683 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal filing that defines and discusses the concept of "implied bias" in the context of jury selection. It cites several legal precedents (Torres, Haynes, Sampson, etc.) to explain that implied bias is presumed by law and is determined by the juror's circumstances, not their stated ability to be impartial. The text highlights that bias can be implied when a juror's personal experiences are similar to the issues being litigated, providing examples from cases involving murder and burglary.

People (10)

Name Role Context
Torres Litigant
Cited in the legal case Torres, 128 F.3d at 43 and 45.
Sampson Litigant
Cited in the legal case Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d at 162–67 and quoted in Daugerdas.
Wood Litigant
Cited in the legal case Wood, 299 U.S. at 133, which is quoted in Torres.
Haynes Litigant
Cited and quoted in the legal case Haynes, 398 F.2d at 984.
Daugerdas Litigant
Cited in the legal case Daugerdas, 867 F. Supp. 2d at 472.
Skaggs Litigant
Cited as a party in the case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co., 164 F.3d 511.
Hunley Litigant
Cited as a party in the case Hunley v. Godinez, 975 F.2d 316.
Godinez Litigant
Cited as a party in the case Hunley v. Godinez, 975 F.2d 316.
Burton Litigant
Cited as a party in the case Burton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150.
Johnson Litigant
Cited as a party in the case Burton v. Johnson, 948 F.2d 1150.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Otis Elevator Co. company
Mentioned as a party in the legal case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co.
10th Cir. government agency
Referenced as the circuit court for the Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co. and Burton v. Johnson cases.
7th Cir. government agency
Referenced as the circuit court for the Hunley v. Godinez case.

Timeline (4 events)

1991
The case of Burton v. Johnson was decided, holding in a murder case.
10th Cir.
1992
The case of Hunley v. Godinez was decided, holding that bias should be implied where two jurors were victims of similar burglaries in a murder/burglary case.
7th Cir.
1998
The case of Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co. was decided, collecting cases where bias was implied based on juror's experiences.
10th Cir.
2022-03-11
Document 642 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Relationships (3)

Skaggs legal (adversarial) Otis Elevator Co.
Parties in the legal case Skaggs v. Otis Elevator Co.
Hunley legal (adversarial) Godinez
Parties in the legal case Hunley v. Godinez.
Burton legal (adversarial) Johnson
Parties in the legal case Burton v. Johnson.

Key Quotes (3)

"Implied or presumed bias is ‘bias conclusively presumed as a matter of law.’"
Source
— Wood, 299 U.S. at 133 (as quoted in Torres) (Defining the legal concept of implied bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009729.jpg
Quote #1
"his statements upon voir dire [about his ability to be impartial] are totally irrelevant."
Source
— Haynes, 398 F.2d at 984 (Explaining that a juror's own assessment of their impartiality is not considered when determining implied bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009729.jpg
Quote #2
"[c]ourts imply bias ‘when there are similarities between the personal experiences of the juror and the issues being litigated.’"
Source
— Sampson, 820 F. Supp. 2d at 163-64 (as quoted in Daugerdas) (Describing one of the two ways in which courts imply bias.)
DOJ-OGR-00009729.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document