HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg

3 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

7
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal review article excerpt / house oversight production
File Size: 3 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal academic article (Minnesota Law Review) discussing the concept of 'underenforcement' in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding sexual assaults and corruption. It argues that underenforcement often stems from bias or favoritism and undermines the legitimacy of legal institutions. The document bears the name of David Schoen (one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys) and a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as part of the congressional investigation into the handling of the Epstein case, likely to argue points regarding prosecutorial discretion or failure to prosecute.

People (7)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney
Name appears at the footer of the document, suggesting he submitted or possessed this document as part of legal proce...
Antonin Scalia Supreme Court Justice
Cited in footnote 27 for his dissent in Morrison v. Olson regarding prosecutorial discretion.
Robert H. Jackson Attorney General of the U.S.
Quoted in footnote 27 regarding the selection of cases for prosecution.
Alexandra Natapoff Author/Legal Scholar
Cited in footnote 28 regarding 'Underenforcement'.
Deborah Tuerkheimer Author/Legal Scholar
Cited in footnote 28 regarding 'Underenforcement as Unequal Protection' in sexual assault offenses.
Zephyr Teachout Author
Cited in footnote 29 regarding 'Corruption in America'.
Angela J. Davis Author
Cited in footnote 33 regarding 'Arbitrary Justice' and prosecutorial discretion.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Minnesota Law Review
Source of the article (103 Minn. L. Rev. 844).
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515'.
U.S. Department of Justice
Cited in footnote 32 as publisher of a report on sexual violence.
N.Y. Times
Cited in footnote 31.

Locations (2)

Location Context
General context of the legal discussion.
UK
Cited in footnote 27 regarding parliamentary debates.

Key Quotes (3)

"The primary causes of underenforcement are failing to investigate and charge due to biases against certain victims or harms, or favoritism toward certain kinds of suspects."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
Quote #1
"Suspicion of underenforcement is itself a cost, because it reflects a loss of legitimacy for criminal justice institutions."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
Quote #2
"More generally, underenforcement is a form of unequal treatment that unevenly - and unjustly - distributes the important public benefits of criminal law enforcement, including the state's commitment to protect everyone equally from unlawful harms."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016515.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document