EFTA00029844.pdf
258 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
5
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / motion response
File Size:
258 KB
Summary
Defense counsel Laura Menninger objects to government redactions in the case US v. Maxwell. Menninger argues that 'Accuser-2's' diary entries are not confidential as they were shared on a NY Times podcast and do not implicate Maxwell. The letter also argues against redacting information about another accuser (name redacted) who has publicized her allegations via Netflix and podcasts, referencing the 'Kramer notes', and discusses sealing issues related to Maxwell's deposition in a separate civil case ruled on by Judge Preska.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Laura A. Menninger | Defense Counsel |
Author of the letter, representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case and the objections being filed.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter, District Court Judge.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Mentioned |
Mentioned in context of Accuser-2's diary entry regarding a first meeting.
|
| Accuser-2 | Witness/Accuser |
Mentioned regarding a diary read on a NY Times podcast; defense argues her diary does not mention Maxwell.
|
| Colleen McMahon | Chief Judge |
Referenced regarding previous sealed proceedings and prosecutor statements.
|
| Sarah Netburn | Magistrate Judge |
Referenced regarding rulings issued nearly two years prior.
|
| Loretta Preska | Judge |
Presiding judge over the civil litigation (15-cv-7433-LAP) who ruled on sealed deposition testimony.
|
| [Redacted] | Accuser/Witness |
Individual who has made allegations in 'Kramer notes', podcasts, and Netflix appearances (likely Virginia Giuffre bas...
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C. |
Law firm representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
|
| United States District Court, Southern District of New York |
Court where the case is being heard.
|
|
| Boies Schiller |
Law firm mentioned as a subpoena recipient.
|
|
| NY Times |
Mentioned as the host of a podcast where Accuser-2 read from a diary.
|
|
| Netflix |
Mentioned as a platform where a redacted accuser has made appearances.
|
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the District Court.
|
|
|
Location of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C.
|
Relationships (2)
On behalf of defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, we respectfully oppose...
Accuser-2 'stopped writing in her journal about a month after that first meeting with Epstein'
Key Quotes (3)
"Accuser-2 'stopped writing in her journal about a month after that first meeting with Epstein' and the rest of her diary is 'personal in nature and ha[s] nothing to do with the defendant or Epstein.'"Source
EFTA00029844.pdf
Quote #1
"The government has offered no explanation for their need to protect her 'privacy' interests when she has profited with her numerous podcasts, Netflix appearances and other media participation"Source
EFTA00029844.pdf
Quote #2
"Because [REDACTED] has already publicly proclaimed the same allegations as are represented in the Kramer notes at 4-5... the government cannot show any privacy interest in keeping those portions redacted or sealed."Source
EFTA00029844.pdf
Quote #3
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document