DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
1000 KB
Extraction Summary
14
People
1
Organizations
15
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
1000 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that pre-release waivers of extradition are unenforceable and meaningless because any defendant who flees will inevitably contest the waiver's validity. The author cites numerous court cases, including United States v. Epstein, to support the claim that such waivers are merely an "empty gesture." The document also refutes the defense's counterarguments by distinguishing the specific factual circumstances of the cases they rely upon.
People (14)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Epstein.
|
| Morrison | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Morrison.
|
| Kazeem | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Kazeem.
|
| Young | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Young.
|
| Cohen | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Cohen.
|
| Bohn | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Bohn.
|
| Stroh | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Stroh.
|
| Botero | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Botero.
|
| Khashoggi | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Khashoggi.
|
| Salvagno | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Salvagno.
|
| Chen | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Chen.
|
| Karni | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Karni.
|
| Cirillo | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Cirillo.
|
| Georgiou | Defendant |
Cited in the case United States v. Georgiou.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States | Government agency |
Appears as the plaintiff in numerous cited court cases (e.g., United States v. Epstein).
|
Locations (15)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, cited in United States v. Epstein and United States v. Kha...
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, cited in United States v. Morrison.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, cited in United States v. Kazeem.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, cited in United States v. Young.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, cited in United States v. Cohen and United States v. Chen.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, cited in United States v. Bohn.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, cited in United States v. Stroh.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, cited in United States v. Botero.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the location from which the defendant in United States v. Khashoggi waived his right to appeal extradition.
|
|
|
Mentioned as the destination for the defendant in United States v. Khashoggi for his arraignment.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York, cited in United States v. Salvagno.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, cited in United States v. Karni.
|
|
|
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, cited in United States v. Cirillo.
|
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, cited in United States v. Georgiou.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a country where a waiver of extradition may not be enforceable, as conceded by defense counsel in United...
|
Relationships (4)
The document cites the court case United States v. Epstein.
The document cites the court case United States v. Khashoggi.
The document cites the court case United States v. Cirillo.
The document cites the court case United States v. Georgiou.
Key Quotes (6)
"The Defense proposal to give advance consent to extradition and waiver of extradition rights is, in the Court’s view, an empty gesture. And, it comes into [play] only after [the defendant] has fled the Court’s jurisdiction."Source
— Court in United States v. Epstein
(A quote from a 2019 S.D.N.Y. court decision used to support the argument that waivers of extradition are meaningless.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #1
"have addressed concerns about a defendant’s ties to a foreign state that enforces extradition waiver by requiring the defendant to execute such a waiver as a condition of release."Source
— The defense
(An argument made by the defense, quoted from their motion (Mot. at 26), which the author of this document is refuting.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #2
"novel"Source
— Court in United States v. Khashoggi
(Description of the Government's case in United States v. Khashoggi, used to distinguish it from the current case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #3
"untried theory of liability"Source
— Court in United States v. Khashoggi
(Description of the Government's case in United States v. Khashoggi, used to distinguish it from the current case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #4
"taken a number of surprising turns,” including the “suppression of video evidence, the indeterminate stay of proceedings, the overall uncertainty of the government’s evidence"Source
— Court in United States v. Chen
(Description of the circumstances in the Chen case that led to a reconsideration of pretrial release, used to distinguish it from the current case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #5
"defense counsel concedes that a waiver of extradition may not be enforceable in Canada, a fact the court in Cirillo did not mention in its opinion"Source
— Court in United States v. Georgiou
(A point from the Georgiou case used to distinguish the facts of the Cirillo case, which the defense had cited.)
DOJ-OGR-00002179.jpg
Quote #6
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document