DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg

625 KB
View Original

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 625 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal transcript or filing where the speaker argues that a court must independently evaluate a government's motion to dismiss and is required to consider the victims' views before making a decision. The speaker cites the case of United States v. Heaton and the expert opinion of former Judge Paul G. Cassell, who concluded that the Crime Victims' Rights Act gives victims broad rights in such matters. The speaker expresses full agreement with this viewpoint, despite some factual differences between the current case and the Heaton case.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Heaton defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the case 'United States v. Heaton', where the government filed a motion to dismiss a ch...
Paul G. Cassell district Judge / law professor
Cited as a former district judge who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and an expert in victims' right...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States government agency
Mentioned as the plaintiff in the case 'United States v. Heaton'.
University of Utah educational institution
Mentioned as the university where Paul G. Cassell is a law professor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the document.

Timeline (2 events)

The government filed a Rule 48 motion for leave to dismiss a charge against a defendant in the case United States v. Heaton.
A hearing is mentioned where the court should consider the views of the victims before deciding on a motion to dismiss.
victims court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in the context of the University of Utah.

Key Quotes (3)

"It is also, in my view, required that the court consider the views of the victims in the case at the hearing and before deciding whether to grant the motion."
Source
— Unknown (speaker in the transcript) (The speaker is stating their opinion on the court's obligation to hear from victims before dismissing a case.)
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
Quote #1
"under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, victims have broad rights that extend to a court's decision whether to grant a government motion to dismiss under Rule 48."
Source
— Paul G. Cassell (This is a summary of Judge Cassell's conclusion, which the speaker is citing as precedent or persuasive authority.)
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
Quote #2
"I completely share that viewpoint in these circumstances, even though the facts of our case, as I said, are somewhat different from those in Heaton."
Source
— Unknown (speaker in the transcript) (The speaker is aligning their own view with that of Judge Cassell regarding victims' rights.)
DOJ-OGR-00000645.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document