HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg

2.17 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

5
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / law review article (house oversight exhibit)
File Size: 2.17 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2007 Utah Law Review article (page 58 of 78 in the exhibit) discussing the legal rights of crime victims, specifically the appointment of counsel and the right to be heard regarding a defendant's release. It cites the case *United States v. Stamper* and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The document bears the name David Schoen and a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was submitted as evidence or background material in a congressional investigation, likely related to the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case given Schoen's involvement as Epstein's lawyer.

People (5)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Attorney / Document Custodian
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating he likely produced this document for the House Oversight Commi...
Stamper Defendant
Defendant in the cited case United States v. Stamper.
Beloof Author
Cited in footnote 457.
Cassell Author
Cited in footnotes 457 and 464.
Twist Author
Cited in footnote 457.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Utah Law Review
Publisher of the text (2007 Utah L. Rev. 861).
U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Court that presided over the Stamper case.
Congress
Mentioned regarding appropriations for counsel payment.
Advisory Committee
Mentioned regarding proposals to change legal rules.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

1991
United States v. Stamper case decision
Western District of North Carolina
Stamper U.S. District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the Stamper case.

Relationships (1)

David Schoen Document Production House Oversight Committee
Name 'DAVID SCHOEN' appears above Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693'.

Key Quotes (4)

"My proposed rule would simply confirm the existing discretionary power of the courts to appoint volunteer counsel demonstrated in cases like Stamper."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
Quote #1
"A victim has the right to be heard regarding any decision to release the defendant."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
Quote #2
"The court shall consider the views of victims in making any release decision, including such decisions in petty cases."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
Quote #3
"prosecutors are obligated by the CVRA to 'advise the crime victim that the crime victim can seek advice of an attorney...'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017693.jpg
Quote #4

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document