HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg

1.35 MB
View Original

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (statement of undisputed facts)
File Size: 1.35 MB
Summary

This document is a 'Statement of Undisputed Facts' filed by defendant Bradley J. Edwards in a civil case brought by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida (Case No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG). The filing asserts as Fact #1 that Epstein has a 'sexual preference for young children,' citing a deposition from March 17, 2010. A footnote details that during this deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent regarding this subject, which Edwards argues allows for an adverse inference against Epstein.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Plaintiff
Subject of the statement of facts; accused of having a sexual preference for young children; invoked 5th amendment du...
Scott Rothstein Defendant
Sued individually by Epstein.
Bradley J. Edwards Defendant / Attorney
Author of the Statement of Undisputed Facts; sued individually by Epstein.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit
Court where the case is filed (Palm Beach County, Florida).

Timeline (1 events)

March 17, 2010
Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein
Unknown (referenced in document)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the court.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Adversarial/Legal Bradley J. Edwards
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG
Jeffrey Epstein Adversarial/Legal Scott Rothstein
Plaintiff vs. Defendant in Case No.:50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG

Key Quotes (3)

"Defendant Epstein has a sexual preference for young children."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #1
"When questioned about this subject at his deposition, Epstein invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent rather than make an incriminating admission."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #2
"Edwards is entitled to the adverse inference against Epstein that, had Epstein answered, the answer would have been unfavorable to him."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013319.jpg
Quote #3

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document