DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
729 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal ruling / court order (page 24 of 31)
File Size:
729 KB
Summary
This document is page 24 of a court filing (likely an order or opinion) in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text discusses a legal analysis regarding the unsealing of grand jury materials, weighing the defendant's (Maxwell) opposition against the public interest. The Court concludes that the specific factor of 'public interest' weighs decisively against unsealing because the materials consist of summary testimony by law enforcement that is already public record due to the trial, and lacks the historical significance found in cases like the Rosenbergs or Alger Hiss.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Opposes disclosure of grand jury materials; case is on direct appeal.
|
| Julius Rosenberg | Historical Figure |
Mentioned in case citation regarding 1950 grand jury testimony.
|
| Ethel Rosenberg | Historical Figure |
Mentioned in case citation regarding 1950 grand jury testimony.
|
| Alger Hiss | Historical Figure |
Mentioned in case citation regarding 1947-1950 grand jury testimony.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
Analyzing factors for unsealing documents; assigns limited weight to Maxwell's opposition.
|
|
| The Government |
Filed a motion regarding disclosure.
|
|
| Grand Jury |
Received evidence in June 2020 and March 2021.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Unknown (Past)
Month-long trial on charges returned by the grand jury
Court
Ghislaine Maxwell
Law Enforcement Agents
Relationships (1)
Maxwell opposes the government's motion in ongoing litigation.
Key Quotes (5)
"Maxwell opposes disclosure because, among other reasons, her case remains on direct appeal."Source
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
Quote #1
"Because this is ongoing litigation in a criminal case involving a living defendant with existing legal remedies, the government’s motion should be denied."Source
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
Quote #2
"This factor so decisively weighs against unsealing that it alone would require denying the Government’s motion."Source
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
Quote #3
"the grand jury materials here are neither of historical nor public-interest importance."Source
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
Quote #4
"it consists of summary testimony by law enforcement agents recounting information that today is a matter of public record"Source
DOJ-OGR-00015156.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document