EFTA00013258.pdf
76.7 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
76.7 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from October 2020 regarding the privilege review of the 'Epstein SW [Search Warrant] returns' database. The participants discuss identifying and segregating privileged communications, specifically flagging emails related to attorney Jack Goldberger and materials from private investigators, including Roy Black, to determine if they are protected by attorney-client or work-product privilege.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of the search warrant database review; deceased at time of emails.
|
| Roy Black | Investigator / Attorney |
Identified in the email text as 'an investigator named Roy Black' whose communications were found in the database. (N...
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Identified as someone who represented Epstein; his emails were flagged for privilege review.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein Estate |
Referenced as 'the estate' communicating directly with reviewers.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2020-10-12
Privilege review of Epstein Search Warrant (SW) database
N/A
Review team (names redacted)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of criminal investigation and related civil litigation mentioned.
|
Relationships (2)
Email states Goldberger 'represented Epstein'
Email states Epstein 'hired private investigators' and names Roy Black as one found in the database.
Key Quotes (4)
"In our review of this database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among others, an investigator named Roy Black."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #1
"We don’t know whether these materials are privileged."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #2
"The Goldberger hits have been moved out."Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #3
"I saw an email from the following email address that I wanted to flag for further privilege review, because it may belong to Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein"Source
EFTA00013258.pdf
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document