DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
639 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
0
Organizations
2
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
639 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court filing, page 50 of 84, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the defense's argument to dismiss allegations concerning "Minor Victim-3," claiming the defendant's conduct with her was lawful in the United Kingdom and that she was an adult when she was later abused by Epstein in the U.S. The defense contends the government mistakenly charged the defendant, believing Minor Victim-3 was a minor at the time of the alleged sex acts with Epstein.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Minor Victim-3 | Victim |
Subject of defense arguments regarding the legality of her interactions with the defendant and Epstein, based on her ...
|
| Epstein | Abuser |
Mentioned as having abused Minor Victim-1, Minor Victim-2, and Minor Victim-3. The defense argues that his alleged se...
|
| Minor Victim-1 | Victim |
Mentioned as being abused by Epstein around the same time as the events involving Minor Victim-3.
|
| Minor Victim-2 | Victim |
Mentioned as being abused by Epstein around the same time as the events involving Minor Victim-3.
|
| Robinson | Defendant in a cited case |
Defendant in the case United States v. Robinson, cited as precedent. He argued a victim was his 'girlfriend' and he h...
|
| Jane Doe | Victim/Prostitute |
A figure in the cited case United States v. Robinson, whom Robinson claimed was his 'girlfriend'.
|
Timeline (5 events)
Epstein abusing Minor Victim-1 and Minor Victim-2.
Alleged sex acts between Epstein and Minor Victim-3.
The government presented Minor Victim-3's allegations to the grand jury.
government
grand jury
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The defense argues that the defendant's conduct with Minor Victim-3 was lawful here, and that she was above the age o...
|
|
|
The country where Minor Victim-3 ultimately traveled and was abused by Epstein. Also the jurisdiction of the court case.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states that Minor Victim-3 was "abused by Epstein" and mentions her "alleged sex acts with Epstein."
The document states that Epstein was "abusing Minor Victim-1."
The document states that Epstein was "abusing Minor Victim-2."
Key Quotes (5)
"necessary to complete the story of the crime on trial."Source
— United States v. Robinson, 702 F.3d 22, 37 (2d Cir. 2012)
(A legal standard cited from a previous case regarding the admissibility of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
Quote #1
"[a]s to [Minor Victim-3], the completed endeavor—i.e., her alleged sex acts with Epstein—was not a substantive criminal offense."Source
— Defense
(Quoted from a defense motion (Def. Mot. 4 at 8) arguing against the charges related to Minor Victim-3.)
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
Quote #2
"of no consequence,"Source
— Defense
(The defense's claim about the allegations relating to Minor Victim-3 in the Indictment.)
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
Quote #3
"the government evidently charged the conduct under the mistaken belief that [Minor Victim-3] was a minor when she engaged in sex acts with Epstein."Source
— Defense
(Quoted from a defense motion (Id. at 9-10) to explain why the charges are allegedly baseless.)
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
Quote #4
"did not know that [Minor Victim-3] was above the [age] of consent in the U.K."Source
— Defense (describing the government's state of mind)
(The defense's assertion about the government's lack of knowledge regarding Minor Victim-3's age of consent in the UK.)
DOJ-OGR-00005833.jpg
Quote #5
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document