| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
United States
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
colleagues
|
Professional academic |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Robinson and her colleagues worked to untangle and classify mathematical problems. | Unspecified | View |
| 2019-07-31 | N/A | Multiple inmates moved to Special Housing Unit (SHU). | Special Housing Unit (SHU) | View |
| 2007-01-01 | Legal case | Decision in United States v. Robinson, 473 F.3d 487. | 2d Cir. | View |
| 1991-01-01 | Court case | U.S. v. Robinson, 924 F.2d 612, 613 (6th Cir. 1991) | 6th Circuit | View |
| 1976-01-01 | Legal case | United States v. Robinson, 543 F.2d 951 (2d Cir. 1976) | 2d Cir. | View |
This document is a Daily Lieutenant's Log from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York for July 31, 2019. It details operational events across three shifts (Morning, Day, Evening), including inmate counts, movements to hospitals and SHU, and facility issues. Notably, the log reports that the fire alarm, pump system, and public address system were inoperable or malfunctioning, requiring a 'Fire Watch' protocol.
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center in New York dated July 25, 2019, covering activities from the previous day. It explicitly states that inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) was on suicide watch with an inmate companion. The report also highlights operational issues, including broken doors/gates, a 'Fire Watch' in progress, and a shortage of staff that forced the vacating of a correctional assignment in the Special Housing Unit (SHU #4).
This is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in New York dated July 25, 2019, covering activities for the previous day. Crucially, it documents that Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate #76318-054) was on 'Suicide Watch w/inmate companion' at this time. The report also highlights significant operational issues, including 9 staff members listed as AWOL, a staff shortage causing SHU #4 to be vacated, and inoperative fire doors necessitating a 'Fire Watch.'
This document is a Daily Activity Report from MCC New York dated August 1, 2019, covering activities from July 31, 2019. It details a significant security breach where inmate Davis was caught with a cellphone and hid it in his body cavity, resulting in his transfer to the Special Housing Unit (SHU) pending FBI referral. The report also highlights significant staffing shortages, noting 9 staff members as AWOL and specific posts on 10-South and 11-South left unassigned due to these shortages.
This document contains a roster of inmates and their corresponding registration numbers for various housing tiers (L, G, H, J, K, M). Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate 76318-054) is listed as being housed in L-Tier. The document serves as a snapshot of inmate housing assignments, likely within the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York.
This legal document, page 24 of a court filing dated September 17, 2024, discusses the sentencing of an individual named Maxwell. It affirms the District Court's application of a 'four-level leadership enhancement' based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Maxwell supervised her assistant, Sarah Kellen, and other testimony corroborated Maxwell's high-level role as Epstein's 'number two and the lady of the house' in Palm Beach.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, discusses the standards for reviewing a sentence for procedural and substantive reasonableness. It specifically addresses a sentencing enhancement for Maxwell, arguing that the District Court correctly found she had a leadership role based on testimony from two of Epstein's pilots. The pilots testified that Sarah Kellen was Maxwell's assistant, which was corroborated by other testimony describing Maxwell as Epstein's "number two and the lady of the house" in Palm Beach.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, argues that a plea agreement made by a United States Attorney's Office (USAO) in one district is generally binding on other USAOs and the federal government as a whole. It cites several court cases, such as Gebbie and Van Thournout, to support this majority view, while also acknowledging contrary or more limited rulings from circuits like the Seventh and Sixth in a footnote.
This document is page 4 (labeled 'iii') of a Table of Authorities from a legal brief filed on November 1, 2024, in Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal). It lists various legal precedents cited in the brief, including a 2024 Second Circuit decision in *U.S. v. Maxwell*, along with citations to other federal cases such as *U.S. v. Papa* and *U.S. v. Persico*. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
This legal document, a page from a court filing, argues that the collateral order exception, which allows for appeals of certain pretrial orders, must be interpreted with 'utmost strictness' in criminal cases. It cites Supreme Court precedent establishing that only four specific types of pretrial orders are appealable under this doctrine. The document emphasizes that the Court has consistently refused to expand this narrow exception, and that any justification for an immediate appeal must be exceptionally strong.
This document is page 9 of a legal brief filed on September 16, 2020, in Case 20-3061 (United States v. Maxwell). The text outlines legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and 'interlocutory appeals' in criminal cases. It cites numerous precedents (Cohen, Stack, Abney, Sell) to demonstrate that the Supreme Court rarely permits appeals before a trial concludes, arguing that an order is only immediately reviewable if rights would be 'effectively unreviewable' later.
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061, dated September 16, 2020) related to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit. The text consists of legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and cites multiple Supreme Court precedents (such as Stack v. Boyle and Sell v. United States) to define when pretrial orders in criminal cases can be appealed immediately. The document argues that exceptions allowing for interlocutory appeals are rare.
This document is page xxi from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on April 16, 2021. It serves as a table of authorities, listing various legal precedents in the format 'United States v. [Defendant]'. Each entry includes the case citation and the corresponding page numbers where it is referenced within the main document.
This legal document is a court filing, page 50 of 84, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It outlines the defense's argument to dismiss allegations concerning "Minor Victim-3," claiming the defendant's conduct with her was lawful in the United Kingdom and that she was an adult when she was later abused by Epstein in the U.S. The defense contends the government mistakenly charged the defendant, believing Minor Victim-3 was a minor at the time of the alleged sex acts with Epstein.
This document is page 794 of the 349 Federal Supplement, 2d Series, containing a legal opinion regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It discusses the 'Torts Exception' and 'Discretionary Function' exception to sovereign immunity, specifically noting that the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is not a state sponsor of terrorism. The text cites various precedents to define discretionary acts versus operational acts in the context of government immunity.
This document is page 782 from a court opinion discussing subject matter jurisdiction under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). It outlines the legal standards for immunity of foreign states, citing precedents like *Saudi Arabia v. Nelson* and *Virtual Countries v. Republic of South Africa*, and details the burden of proof required for plaintiffs to challenge a foreign state's immunity.
A page from a book (page 249) discussing mathematical logic, specifically Diophantine equations, prenex normal forms, and reduction classes compared to topological knots. The text references a mathematician named Robinson (likely Julia Robinson) and her work on classifying mathematical problems. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production related to the Epstein investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity