DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
813 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing / legal memorandum (government response in criminal case)
File Size:
813 KB
Summary
This document is page 106 of a legal filing (Document 204) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on April 16, 2021. The text details the Government's argument that it did not circumvent the 'Martindell' legal standard when seeking evidence previously under protective orders, specifically referring to a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. It notes that Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled that the Government had demonstrated 'extraordinary circumstances' justifying the release of testimony to the grand jury despite previous protective orders.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Judge McMahon | Judge |
Found that the Martindell standard applied and ruled that the Government demonstrated extraordinary circumstances to ...
|
| Judge Netburn | Judge |
Found that the Martindell standard applied and analyzed the Government's application under that framework.
|
| The Government | Prosecution |
Argued for the modification of protective orders to obtain evidence via subpoena.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller |
Received a subpoena from the Government in connection with its investigation.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (referenced in legal citations).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-04-16
Document filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Court Record
Prior to 2021-04-16
Prior to 2021-04-16
Judges McMahon and Netburn ruled on the application of the Martindell standard.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Southern District of New York (Jurisdiction of cited cases)
|
Relationships (2)
The Government issued a subpoena to Boies Schiller in connection with its investigation.
Judge McMahon analyzed the Government's application and found they demonstrated extraordinary circumstances.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Government did not, in any way, attempt to circumvent Martindell."Source
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
Quote #1
"testimony provided pursuant to a protective order can be divulged to a grand jury if the government establishes 'some extraordinary circumstance or compelling need.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
Quote #2
"Chief Judge McMahon found that the 'Government [ ] persuasively demonstrated extraordinary circumstances,' citing 'significant"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
Quote #3
"the public . . . has a right to every man's evidence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00003040.jpg
Quote #4
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document